Users viewing topic: & 2 Guests
12345678910 ... 188189190 ... 865866867868869870871872873874875
John_C | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:06 | |
Member 2213, 300 posts SQ 235, BP 130, DL 215580.0 kgs @ 75kgs Eq | Another thought. The side view will help, but I've got a feeling your upper back is rounding forwards. That can't be a strength issue, surely. A few cues that help me when I do this: elbows drive forward, arch as hard as possible, chest upright as possible. This rounding is different to forward lean. Watch how Andy manges not to round here: http://youtu.be/be6dk8ZVO7E Do you see what I'm getting at? | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:06 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | tz1127 said: I know that you know. I was more or less pointing that out to John and others who may not lift in our fed. In fact, judging on my percieved effort to reach depth (I really did aim for as low as I could get without stapling myself) I would be willing to say my recent one was a bit lower... you can tell depth EVEN LESS from that other video... | ||
John_C | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:07 | |
Member 2213, 300 posts SQ 235, BP 130, DL 215580.0 kgs @ 75kgs Eq | tz1127 said: Fair enough!I know that you know. I was more or less pointing that out to John and others who may not lift in our fed. | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:08 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | f**k it, I'm going doing weightlifting... | ||
tz1127 | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:08 | |
Member 1419, 2281 posts SQ 175, BP 105, DL 240520.0 kgs @ 82kgs UnEq | Tom_Martin said: In fact, judging on my percieved effort to reach depth (I really did aim for as low as I could get without stapling myself) I would be willing to say my recent one was a bit lower... you can tell depth EVEN LESS from that other video... If you want to lift in your current stance I would say the best example of that technique in the IPF would be like this No idea how to get there though | ||
MrSmall | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:09 | |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | Tom_Martin said: No because I'm a pussy with 300+... What weight are you comfortable with descending faster? | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:11 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | tz1127 said: If you want to lift in your current stance I would say the best example of that technique in the IPF would be like this No idea how to get there though By having shorter legs or/and a longer back I'd imagine. He doesn't end up leaning forwards nearly as much as I do.... There are basically rules which must be followed when squatting. Perhaps the most basic of all, is that the bar will always be directly over your heels. My 'proportions' mean that if I don't let my knees go forwards, errr...you figure the rest out... | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:16 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | MrSmall said: What weight are you comfortable with descending faster? approximately 120 | ||
bignige1986 | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:17 | |
Taleban says his views on women are extreme Member 639, 3518 posts SQ 10, BP 10, DL 1030.0 kgs @ 10kgs Eq | tz1127 said: If you want to lift in your current stance I would say the best example of that technique in the IPF would be like this No idea how to get there though Cool as f**k | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:26 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | I said: approximately 120 why can't all squats be like this ... more so, why can't all mine... | ||
bignige1986 | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:36 | |
Taleban says his views on women are extreme Member 639, 3518 posts SQ 10, BP 10, DL 1030.0 kgs @ 10kgs Eq | Tom_Martin said: why can't all squats be like this ... more so, why can't all mine... Your squatting closer... And looks like different shoes ? | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 21:42 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | bignige1986 said: Your squatting closer... And looks like different shoes ? Same shoes, closer stance, higher bar, 200kg less weight.... yeah | ||
bignige1986 | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 22:16 | |
Taleban says his views on women are extreme Member 639, 3518 posts SQ 10, BP 10, DL 1030.0 kgs @ 10kgs Eq | Tom_Martin said: Same shoes, closer stance, higher bar, 200kg less weight.... yeah Im perplexed now What shoes do you use to squat eq ? Maybe a change of shoesies | ||
Tom_Martin | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 22:22 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | bignige1986 said: Im perplexed now What shoes do you use to squat eq ? Maybe a change of shoesies The old adidas ironworx.... They've served me well over the last 7 years. Got the AdiStar 08's on order though | ||
dr_hazbun | ... | 07-04-2011 @ 22:42 | |
tabbouleh and fattoush salads were very refreshing Member 267, 8548 posts SQ 220, BP 165, DL 250635.0 kgs @ 90kgs Eq | I think you are over complicating things. Make the most of your strengths. Put the weight on your back and get the f**ker up that way if you have to. I actually think your equipped squat looks fine. I wouldn't mess about with it too much apart from maybe sinking it a bit faster. Doing this with 300+kg presumably takes balls and the more you practise it (with vigilent spotters) the more depth you'll get. Keep up the good work. | ||
12345678910 ... 188189190 ... 865866867868869870871872873874875