Drug's Failure at the GBPF British Classic Championship 2012

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

This thread has been closed by a moderator. Replies are no longer possible.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

MattD90		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:25
Skaven for the win !! Member 2490, 3589 posts SQ 180, BP 120, DL 230 530.0 kgs @ 82kgs UnEq	Post Edited: 05.11.2012 @ 11:32 AM by MattD90 If there was ever a definition of "You can please some of the people all of the time but you cant please all of the people all the time" powerlifting has to be it lol If I made a thread tomorrow about how powerlifting meets should tend to happen at weekends cos that's when most people are free, SOMEONE SOMEWHERE will say "f**k you I want meets at 2am on a monday morning". SOMEONE will !! lol

force10		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:29
Drugs cheat Member 3860, 630 posts SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330 875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	When I read some of the comments on this subject it saddens me to think not only on this site but others like FB and the main GBPF forum there are people who comment and realy make the federation look a dark nasty place. Yes I was tested positive, But I also think the GBPF do a good job with the testing they conduct, it certainly highlighted something I wasnt awere of, although I did have some suspicions. One thing that makes GBPF look bad is when you get officials commenting and pushing the arguement, it realy doesnt look good for any prospect lifters wanting to start PL in GBPF and make other FEDs look more appealing. If anyone wishes to discuss the GBPF testing please do so, but Please keep it so the federation can be looked upon as respectable, friendly and welcoming for its progression in the future. And if anyone has any negative feedback your quite welcome to PM me. P.S Jay I realy dont like coffee

Power_nash		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:30
Member 1163, 217 posts SQ 390, BP 302.5, DL 320 1012.5 kgs @ 161kgs Eq	Bryn said that a number of anabolic agents where found, fu*k me, thats an extreme pre work out shake! i thought they contained banned stimulants?

milsy		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:35
Ne n coner a fuickex .ay ouse part we .be Member 1425, 4647 posts SQ 340, BP 227.5, DL 335 902.5 kgs @ 125kgs UnEq	force10 said:When I read some of the comments on this subject it saddens me to think not only on this site but others like FB and the main GBPF forum there are people who comment and realy make the federation look a dark nasty place. Yes I was tested positive, But I also think the GBPF do a good job with the testing they conduct, it certainly highlighted something I wasnt awere of, although I did have some suspicions. One thing that makes GBPF look bad is when you get officials commenting and pushing the arguement, it realy doesnt look good for any prospect lifters wanting to start PL in GBPF and make other FEDs look more appealing. If anyone wishes to discuss the GBPF testing please do so, but Please keep it so the federation can be looked upon as respectable, friendly and welcoming for its progression in the future. And if anyone has any negative feedback your quite welcome to PM me. P.S Jay I realy dont like coffee I think a lot of negativaty towards the fed comes from people who don't actually lift in the fed or have even been to a Comp its like two diffrent worlds I have nothing but good things to say about the gbpf

force10		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:35
Drugs cheat Member 3860, 630 posts SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330 875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	Power_nash said:Bryn said that a number of anabolic agents where found, fu*k me, thats an extreme pre work out shake! i thought they contained banned stimulants? You would know that with the big numbers your caperble of lifting then????

Tom_Martin		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:44
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425 1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq	force10 said: You would know that with the big numbers your caperble of lifting then???? So your response to getting banned is to accuse anyone else with decent numbers of being cheats too?

bryce		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:45
Juice loose aboot this hoose Member 1401, 3962 posts SQ 160, BP 107.5, DL 210 477.5 kgs @ 88kgs UnEq	Tom_Martin said: So your response to getting banned is to accuse anyone else with decent numbers of being cheats too? Shut it obvious juicer boy!


force10		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:47
Drugs cheat Member 3860, 630 posts SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330 875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	milsy said: I think a lot of negativaty towards the fed comes from people who don't actually lift in the fed or have even been to a Comp its like two diffrent worlds I have nothing but good things to say about the gbpf I think your right. Even though iv recieved a ban I regard GbPF as the best Fed to lift in, its a shame there are so many people trying to make it look like the Fed to avoid. Even a sport to avoid.

JackRevans		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:48
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.' Member 2477, 16481 posts SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235 555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq	bryce said: Shut it obvious juicer boy! toms pre workout is just sleeping on an empty stomach for optimal growth hormone production

Tom_Martin		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:49
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425 1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq	bryce said: Shut it obvious juicer boy! I know you're joking but....you can accuse me all you like, I'm not competetive and haven't been in a long time, so what I do is irrelevant but, Adam Nash is a current international IPF lifter, accusing someone else from the very same fed you JUST got banned from, based on their numbers being very good is bad form IMO

Fazc		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:53
Sports an extremely muscular arse. Member 38, 6253 posts	This thread gives me a sadface

force10		...	05-11-2012 @ 11:56
Drugs cheat Member 3860, 630 posts SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330 875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	Tom_Martin said: So your response to getting banned is to accuse anyone else with decent numbers of being cheats too? Lets be sensible shall we. Are you realy under the illusion that the human body is caperble of lifting numbers like even yours without any assistance yet alone over 300kg bench whether its equiped or not. I think its spupid comment like yours and others that make PL and GBPF the place to avoid and theres nothing worse than seing a federation discussed in such a damaging manner by people who dont know and are not a part of it, even though im no longer a part of it myself.

Tom_Martin		...	05-11-2012 @ 12:13
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425 1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq	Terrible form.............

davycummings		...	05-11-2012 @ 12:14
he's got betty davis eyes Member 1684, 6001 posts SQ 250, BP 186, DL 291 727.0 kgs @ 118kgs UnEq	I think this thread has now gone further than it should

bryce		...	05-11-2012 @ 12:17
Juice loose aboot this hoose Member 1401, 3962 posts SQ 160, BP 107.5, DL 210 477.5 kgs @ 88kgs UnEq	http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/047/718/InBef...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

You are here: Home → Forum → Competitions → Drug's Failure at the GBPF British Classic Championship 2012

RETURN TO TOP