REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 2 members and 353 guests

Hypertrophy - reps or weight ?

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

12

Big_silly_man_DanIconHypertrophy - reps or weight ?25-06-2007 @ 20:06 
Avatar
sold boar a shit car
Member 27, 209 posts
SQ 220, BP 170, DL 240
630.0 kgs @ 119kgs UnEq
Just need pointing in the right direction from some of the more experienced lifters, if you would be so kind.
My immediate goals are hypertrophy and improving my overall conditioning but long term I want strength gains.
Am I better training in higher rep ranges like 8 reps per set or should I stick to 5 reps and move more weight, or something along those lines ?
Any help is much appreciated as I'm a little confused just now and seem to be changing my routine on a weekly basis.
Thanks in advance.
BoarIcon...25-06-2007 @ 20:11 
Avatar
Nothing left in the tank.
Member 5, 25563 posts
Administrator
the wildboar patented heaVy should do the trick

6 4 2 4 6

what was the question again ? oh, i would go for 8 reps to begin,then have a spurt of lower rep work

mabie get to adders and shag less people who live in scotland
IainKendrickIcon...25-06-2007 @ 20:20 
Avatar
some nice relaxing jazz.
Member 77, 12599 posts
SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280
710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq
My own opinion is that diet is the most important factor in putting muscle on. I put weight on without changing my powerlifting routine as long as I am eating the kcals and protein.

If the diets in place then I acually think its individual as to what rep range to train at. Not very helpfull I know ! I personally need heavy loads using 5x5 or 3x10 style training with assistance exersices around 8-10. I have seen many bodybuilders that would be loath to do less than 10 reps in a set, using the typical 3-4 sets in 4-5 exercises per body part. I think however gear use may be a factor in this style of training working for most.

For me I need to have a least one eye on strength gain (hence lower reps) whilst eating like a hores!
TonyIcon...25-06-2007 @ 20:55 
Avatar
Is partial to the odd bender.
Member 6, 10239 posts
SQ 280, BP 192.5, DL 317.5
790.0 kgs @ 102kgs Eq
I grew from 12 stone 6 to 17 not too fat stone without going over fives.
Ben_Tricky_BurgessIcon...25-06-2007 @ 21:46 
Member 86, 297 posts
Like Iain says, diet is bigger factor than reps/sets imo, but id be hitting middle/high reps generally, occacsionally dipping into 5's and triples for strength gain.
Martin1956Icon...26-06-2007 @ 01:31 
Avatar
Old Age Presser
Member 75, 7740 posts
SQ 0, BP 200, DL 200
400.0 kgs @ 105kgs Eq
Ian, I thought hores liked to watch their figures?Happy
NeilIcon...26-06-2007 @ 10:31 
Avatar
For Kettle, For Country!
Member 81, 1706 posts
SQ 182.5, BP 120, DL 227.5
530.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq
Originally posted by Tony...
I grew from 12 stone 6 to 17 not too fat stone without going over fives.

How long did it take you?
IainKendrickIcon...26-06-2007 @ 11:09 
Avatar
some nice relaxing jazz.
Member 77, 12599 posts
SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280
710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq
Ian, I thought hores liked to watch their figures?


LOL! Despite having 2 degrees (and am currently studying for my doctorate) my spelling is the level of a chimp! Even more so when I type.

Seems like most people have done well using a varing rep x set scheme, but with a focus on lower rep range. Since the end of 2004 I have put on about 10kg (sans pharmacutical aid). Some of this is fat mind you! In that time I have done very few hard sets over 5. With the main hard work being done at the 1-3 mark (including DE effort stuff). Don't get me wrong I regulary do light sets, sometimes up to 20 reps, but not done with any intensity and manly as pre-hab work.
TonyIcon...26-06-2007 @ 17:24 
Avatar
Is partial to the odd bender.
Member 6, 10239 posts
SQ 280, BP 192.5, DL 317.5
790.0 kgs @ 102kgs Eq
How long did it take you?


18 months ish, maybe a little more.

Have a look here for exact dates and some pics

http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/m_562993/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm
NeilIcon...26-06-2007 @ 18:49 
Avatar
For Kettle, For Country!
Member 81, 1706 posts
SQ 182.5, BP 120, DL 227.5
530.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq
Originally posted by Tony...
How long did it take you?


18 months ish, maybe a little more.

Bloody hell! I've put on about 1.5 stone in the last year and thought I was doing pretty well...
Big_silly_man_DanIcon...26-06-2007 @ 19:02 
Avatar
sold boar a shit car
Member 27, 209 posts
SQ 220, BP 170, DL 240
630.0 kgs @ 119kgs UnEq
Cheers lads, so 5 reps and eat right seems to be the general consensus.
madcapIcon...24-03-2008 @ 20:27 
Avatar
Squat rack hog
Member 82, 380 posts
SQ 217.5, BP 145, DL 260
622.5 kgs @ 92kgs UnEq
why does clicking on my journal link at the bottom of my posts link to this thread?
little_aIcon...24-03-2008 @ 20:32 
Avatar
still a devious weightlifting bastard
Member 43, 14374 posts
5's and 10's for me super G. Remember the first place that bodyweight goes, and embrace the power bellieWink
RobIcon...24-03-2008 @ 20:54 
Avatar
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk
Member 1, 7173 posts
SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205
497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq
Administrator
madcap said:
why does clicking on my journal link at the bottom of my posts link to this thread?


Oops, sorted!
aaron_lohanIcon...24-03-2008 @ 21:46 
Avatar
Hasn't always been a bench press specialist
Member 44, 1907 posts
SQ 252.5, BP 220, DL 210
682.5 kgs @ 83kgs Eq
Neil said:
Originally posted by Tony...
How long did it take you?


18 months ish, maybe a little more.

Bloody hell! I've put on about 1.5 stone in the last year and thought I was doing pretty well...


Youve gotta remember Tony was using steroids, 1 and a half stones in a year is a good weight gain

12

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions