Any Photographers with knowledge in copyright of a photo on here

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

Mark		...	30-11-2012 @ 22:47
Member. Member 2171, 1612 posts	It might be worth looking at any small print for when you request his services, there might be something there that says you hand over all rights of copyright to the tog/company for any use that they choose

fredhick		...	30-11-2012 @ 22:50
Let me show you how to do a hitler Member 1070, 433 posts SQ 275, BP 220, DL 310 805.0 kgs @ 116kgs UnEq	Will try and do that, but I didnt request the services my friend did and asked me to model.

Mark		...	30-11-2012 @ 22:53
Member. Member 2171, 1612 posts	Best have a quick word with your friend too and see what paperwork he has from the tog. He might only have an invoice or he might have more. Like you said more info the better when going into things like this

fredhick		...	30-11-2012 @ 22:55
Let me show you how to do a hitler Member 1070, 433 posts SQ 275, BP 220, DL 310 805.0 kgs @ 116kgs UnEq	Will do thanks mark for your input

Mark		...	30-11-2012 @ 23:26
Member. Member 2171, 1612 posts	fredhick said:Will do thanks mark for your input Welcome fella


Steve		...	30-11-2012 @ 23:32
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam Member 255, 3732 posts	fredhick said:Nothing was ever signed, this is what I have read is it correct and does it apply to this situation The distinctions among privacy rights, publicity rights, and copyright are best illustrated by example, as follows: An advertiser wishes to use a photograph for a print advertisement. The advertiser approaches the photographer, who holds the copyright in the photograph, and negotiates a license to use the photograph. The advertiser also is required to determine the relationship between the photographer and the subject of the photograph. If no formal relationship (e.g., a release form signed by the subject) exists that permits the photographer to license the use of the photograph for all uses or otherwise waives the subject's, sitter's or model's rights, then the advertiser must seek permission from the subject of the photograph because the subject has retained both privacy and publicity rights in the use of their likeness. The privacy right or interest of the subject is personal in character, that the subject and his/her likeness not be cast before the public eye without his/her consent, the right to be left alone. The publicity right of the subject is that their image may not be commercially exploited without his/her consent and potentially compensation. Are you sure that isn't US law, rather than UK law? In the UK photographers seem to be able to pretty much take photos of who they want and then sell them on without the subjects receiving any reward.

Boar		...	01-12-2012 @ 07:30
Nothing left in the tank. Member 5, 25563 posts Administrator	Sometimes there are fights we just can't win, its difficult to let it go , but this guy is being civil probably because he knows he has this one.

ben66		...	01-12-2012 @ 07:36
Why get fat to look big? Member 1330, 4797 posts SQ 300, BP 200, DL 305 805.0 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq	Boar said:Sometimes there are fights we just can't win, its difficult to let it go , but this guy is being civil probably because he knows he has this one. I'd agree, It's too late to get the photo removed, and I don't think you'll get any recompense in the end.

MarkClegg		...	01-12-2012 @ 08:56
knock knock !! who's there ?? OLD SCHOOL SUGDEN Member 212, 11439 posts SQ 325, BP 212.5, DL 370 907.5 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq	Post Edited: 01.12.2012 @ 09:04 AM by MarkClegg If a photographer can go smash through a crowd and take a photo of a celeb showing her panties getting out of a cab . Then publish it in celebmag . What chance have you got ? f**kall He took it, it's his photo . He sold it . Give it up . You won't be getting nothing from this . I'm sure about that . NB - I'm not either a photographer nor publisher . I dont know anything . But I'm pretty sure Tulisa didn't want that video of her sucking that mushroom tip to get out . Abi Titmiss didn't want that vid of her mopping that black bird to come out . They did come and you can now watch them vids on any self respecting porn site . So things could be worse Fred . At least it's not a vid of you blowing someone off ! :-)

chaos		...	01-12-2012 @ 09:27
An amazing human being Member 2047, 17156 posts SQ 262.5, BP 170, DL 300 732.5 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	MarkClegg said: So things could be worse Fred . At least it's not a vid of you blowing someone off ! :-) Do you want me to email you that vid?

brownbear		...	01-12-2012 @ 09:27
Morrisons - rump - 7£ Member 2206, 11578 posts SQ 228, BP 150, DL 260 638.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq	MarkClegg said:If a photographer can go smash through a crowd and take a photo of a celeb showing her panties getting out of a cab . Then publish it in celebmag . What chance have you got ? fkall He took it, it's his photo . He sold it . Give it up . You won't be getting nothing from this . I'm sure about that . NB - I'm not either a photographer nor publisher . I dont know anything . But I'm pretty sure Tulisa didn't want that video of her sucking that mushroom tip** to get out . Abi Titmiss didn't want that vid of her mopping that black bird to come out . They did come and you can now watch them vids on any self respecting porn site . So things could be worse Fred . At least it's not a vid of you blowing someone off ! :-) She didnt want it to come out... so future boyfriends wont be scared away by her absolute lack of ability at oral sex?

deleted2_20210523		...	01-12-2012 @ 09:46
Member 2606, 11453 posts SQ 170, BP 117.5, DL 215 502.5 kgs @ 91.6kgs UnEq	deleted

1 2

You are here: Home → Forum → General Bullshit → Any Photographers with knowledge in copyright of a photo on here

RETURN TO TOP