REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 0 members and 212 guests

fallacy friday debunking the deload

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

12

IrishMarcIconfallacy friday debunking the deload13-12-2013 @ 19:40 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
http://www.castironstrength.com/fallacy-friday-debunking-the-d...
IainKendrickIcon...13-12-2013 @ 19:50 
Avatar
some nice relaxing jazz.
Member 77, 12599 posts
SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280
710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq
Nice article.
IrishMarcIcon...13-12-2013 @ 20:10 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
Cheers Ian, beginning to think 8:00pm Friday might not be the best relase time for this kind of content.
SBradwell83Icon...14-12-2013 @ 10:12 
Member 3850, 516 posts
SQ 212.5, BP 157.5, DL 240
610.0 kgs @ 76kgs UnEq
Very good read!!! Like all the articles on your blog.
BillytheoldIconGreat article14-12-2013 @ 12:54 
Avatar
Sugdens crazy old person.
Member 4936, 7288 posts
SQ 270, BP 155, DL 270
695.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq
A buck in the wild changes speeds, eats,sleeps etc at different intensities. The human I was told is the only creature that trains intense at a constant. For example: a marathon runner runs a constant pace whereas an animal runs all different speeds which is more natural. Oh well! I hope I read the article right! I try to train like an animal!! Awww.! My life dictates the way I train naturally!!
tz1127Icon...15-12-2013 @ 13:23 
Avatar
Member 1419, 2281 posts
SQ 175, BP 105, DL 240
520.0 kgs @ 82kgs UnEq
Nice article. Basically I look at it this way- most people undertrain so deloading is unnecessary. For others, deload will come naturally as a consequence of life events, peaking and resting for competitions, or injury/illness.

Planned deload is probably best suited for the risk adverse, who in all likelihood would not reach an overreached stage anyway.
FazcIcon...15-12-2013 @ 13:55 
Avatar
Sports an extremely muscular arse.
Member 38, 6253 posts
Had a chance to read it, great material Marc.
NimbleIcon...16-12-2013 @ 01:01 
Avatar
woefully weak
Member 4748, 1506 posts
SQ 157, BP 133, DL 260
550.0 kgs @ 104kgs UnEq
As a beginner, I find this interesting. Having done 5/3/1 in the past I always found the 4th week a complete waste of time at my level. 1 Question:

"5 week linear blocks that went from high volume to low intensity for 4-5+ blocks" What does that look like (approximately)? Does this mean each block goes from high volume to low (high?) intensity or that the blocks themselves are progressively lower volume and higher intensity?
DeanW92Icon...16-12-2013 @ 20:47 
Member 4496, 1446 posts
SQ 240, BP 200, DL 300
740.0 kgs @ 112kgs UnEq
Deloading is very individual, beginners should't need it but some intermediate and advanced lifters do, there will be many of the top lifters that never 'deload' but also many that regularly have down time in their training.

I believe there are many factors that effect how often you need to deload, if at all, they include:
*Recovery protocol e.g, sleep and food.
*personal recovery ability, not everyone is the same.
*level of strength.
*Effort put into your training session, e.g. 5x5 @ 70% shouldn't be too difficult, some people would only put in the required effort, others would treat each rep as a max effort and try move the weight as fast as possible.
*Use of stimulants.
*Psyching up for lifts.
*Volume and or intensity.
*Programming, there are many programs on the internet but not many that have a yearly plan, if a programs varies from times of high intensity and then drops to using lower weights but with a bit higher volume, you are backing off but not in the same manner as 5/3/1.

Iv personally had periods where iv pushed the intensity for a long period of time and after a couple of weeks where I hit PB's, I then regressed back quite a lot and then it took months to eventually get back to where I previously was. Deloads help me avoid this problem.
IrishMarcIcon...16-12-2013 @ 20:56 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
Nimble said:As a beginner, I find this interesting. Having done 5/3/1 in the past I always found the 4th week a complete waste of time at my level. 1 Question:

"5 week linear blocks that went from high volume to low intensity for 4-5+ blocks" What does that look like (approximately)? Does this mean each block goes from high volume to low (high?) intensity or that the blocks themselves are progressively lower volume and higher intensity?


3x10 @ 75%
3x8 @ 78%
3x6 @ 83.5%
4x4 @ 88%
3x3 @ 91%

Next programme add weight to loads repeat till stalls then use a different programme

DeanW92 said:Deloading is very individual, beginners should't need it but some intermediate and advanced lifters do, there will be many of the top lifters that never 'deload' but also many that regularly have down time in their training.

I believe there are many factors that effect how often you need to deload, if at all, they include:
*Recovery protocol e.g, sleep and food.
*personal recovery ability, not everyone is the same.
*level of strength.
*Effort put into your training session, e.g. 5x5 @ 70% shouldn't be too difficult, some people would only put in the required effort, others would treat each rep as a max effort and try move the weight as fast as possible.
*Use of stimulants.
*Psyching up for lifts.
*Volume and or intensity.
*Programming, there are many programs on the internet but not many that have a yearly plan, if a programs varies from times of high intensity and then drops to using lower weights but with a bit higher volume, you are backing off but not in the same manner as 5/3/1.

Iv personally had periods where iv pushed the intensity for a long period of time and after a couple of weeks where I hit PB's, I then regressed back quite a lot and then it took months to eventually get back to where I previously was. Deloads help me avoid this problem.


I know many very strong lifter who never have planned deloads. They train lighter for peroids but it's not often planned.

Taking a planned week of rest in every 3 isn't really a great "deload" stratagem but merely an arbitrary rule of thumb.

There is a cascade of reasons why you should train lighter for a period (hit a good peak, injury, come off your bicycle etc). Taking it easy because a spreadsheet told me too isn't a good reason IMO.
DeanW92Icon...16-12-2013 @ 21:04 
Member 4496, 1446 posts
SQ 240, BP 200, DL 300
740.0 kgs @ 112kgs UnEq
Post Edited: 16.12.2013 @ 21:04 PM by DeanW92
IrishMarc said:
I know many very strong lifter who never have planned deloads. They train lighter for peroids but it's not often planned.
Taking a planned week of rest in every 3 isn't really a great "deload" stratagem but merely an arbitrary rule of thumb.
There is a cascade of reasons why you should train lighter for a period (hit a good peak, injury, come off your bicycle etc). Taking it easy because a spreadsheet told me too isn't a good reason IMO.


I completely agree, again using a 5/3/1 as an example, many people would be better off going for about 6 weeks or even longer before a deload. I personally find that for myself though, I can push hard for 3 weeks and then I start to go backwards, so surely for me having a deload on the 4th week is good for my personal needs?
IrishMarcIcon...16-12-2013 @ 21:08 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
DeanW92 said:
I completely agree, again using a 5/3/1 as an example, many people would be better off going for about 6 weeks or even longer before a deload. I personally find that for myself though, I can push hard for 3 weeks and then I start to go backwards, so surely for me having a deload on the 4th week is good for my personal needs?


If it works for you then do it by all means, in my experience however people can push for very long peroids of time with out the need for a planned deload.
JordanWebsterIcon...16-12-2013 @ 21:33 
Avatar
Member 4207, 109 posts
SQ 260, BP 160, DL 277
697.0 kgs @ 118.8kgs UnEq
I actually completely agree. Looking back at my training from earlier this year, I was doing 3 volume cycles back to back and I took 1 week deloads in between them. I feel those deloads were un-necessary and I felt worse after them. I did 12 weeks of volume hoping to overreach, but at the end of each 4 week block I felt stronger than ever and felt like I could have kept doing the 4 week blocks indefinitely adding weight on each one.

I read a while back that one shouldn't really do more than 3 volume blocks in a row but I felt so strong and my performance hadn't decreased at all, so I don't think I had truly over reached. That, or I was using the wrong programming for my strength levels and I should take a more novice approach.

This year I'm going to do a more basic program and just judge training how I feel, not what I've read online and just push it hard.
SteveIcon...16-12-2013 @ 21:46 
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam
Member 255, 3732 posts
IrishMarc said:
I know many very strong lifter who never have planned deloads. They train lighter for peroids but it's not often planned.
Taking a planned week of rest in every 3 isn't really a great "deload" stratagem but merely an arbitrary rule of thumb.
There is a cascade of reasons why you should train lighter for a period (hit a good peak, injury, come off your bicycle etc). Taking it easy because a spreadsheet told me too isn't a good reason IMO.


But surely an easy week, even if it is not pre planed, but done on feel/need/injury .... Is still deloading? And if a taper allows you to lift more in a competition, surely a taper in training might allow you to go on to lift more in training?
brownbearIcon...16-12-2013 @ 21:52 
Avatar
Morrisons - rump - 7£
Member 2206, 11578 posts
SQ 228, BP 150, DL 260
638.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq
have you even.....


do you even



FIVE f**king THREE f**king ONE

12

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions