REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 0 members and 191 guests

Mapped out routines slow your progress?

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

123

VinnyJonesIcon...07-11-2013 @ 12:14 
Avatar
Who said it's hardcore?
Member 3896, 847 posts
SQ 265, BP 150, DL 320
735.0 kgs @ 128kgs UnEq
MrSmall said:Slow your progress compared to what, some mythical skyrocket progress from "training harder" than the program entails? Some people are greedy and look for a magical exercise/routine/philosophy to somehow trump the next guy's steady work ethic.


This. So many times I have seen a person say that they go hard and heavy or go home.

No surprise that these people tend to be injured or fatigued most of the time though.

Not that injuries cannot happen to everyone; but damage limitation seems to be a sensible idea in my book. Would rather be injured through accident than by design.
RicoIcon...07-11-2013 @ 12:46 
Avatar
Sugdens very own David Dimbleby
Member 1403, 3716 posts
SQ 220, BP 115, DL 260
595.0 kgs @ 97kgs UnEq
I am currently doing madcow 5x5 and if i feel good I will go for an extra couple of reps, as long as get the prescribed reps.
JCIcon...07-11-2013 @ 13:40 
Avatar
technical retard
Member 172, 36827 posts
SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335
850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq
richn said:I was watching a video of Elliott Hulse on youtube last night and in his video he was saying he believes a set routine with percentages can actually slow your progress, he believes that you should go all out and not stick to the percentage set as that could be below what you actually could do on that given day which slows your progress. So if on that day your feeling good go for more if your feeling tired cut back a little etc.

whats your opinions on this?

do you think its best to have a routine set with percentages? or have the principles of lets say a 5/3/1 routine but go on how you feel?


5/3/1 you dont stop at, for example, a set of 5 at 70% do you?

You can do 10 on your last set at 70% if its in the tank

What you're talking about doesnt really apply to 5/3/1 as you can work as hard as you choose to on that fixed percentage program
richnIcon...07-11-2013 @ 14:03 
Avatar
Member 4811, 50 posts
SQ 160, BP 110, DL 200
470.0 kgs @ 104kgs UnEq
JC said:
5/3/1 you dont stop at, for example, a set of 5 at 70% do you?
You can do 10 on your last set at 70% if its in the tank
What you're talking about doesnt really apply to 5/3/1 as you can work as hard as you choose to on that fixed percentage program


Its not my opinion as I dont agree with it as I believe in having a plan set. I was just seeing what you guys thought about it? If you rep out 10 instead of 5 on 70% on your last set how would that effect the next workout would you recalculate your percentages and increase the weight or go back to what you should have lifted in the first place?

Thanks for the replies
IrishMarcIcon...07-11-2013 @ 14:03 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
Post Edited: 07.11.2013 @ 14:06 PM by IrishMarc
5/3/1 isn't really a percentage programme it just gives out guidelines but encurages you to go as hard as you can every session (outside of deloads obviously).

Something like Smolov / RSR / RSM is more appropriate as an example. Both approaches work but I would heavily favour a good percentage based programme over a rep out programme any day of the week.

At the end of the day what makes the biggest diffrence to your strength level is the amount of quality volume you can get in and percentage programmes ensure you get enough of it to progress well and for a long period.

The trick in keeping it going is manipulation of what you do and knowing when to push and when to coast.

I think PED use clouds the waters on this massively when talking about which is superior.

If you enter a peroid of 12 weeks where you are guaranteed to make fast progress then of course pushing as hard as you can each session with out injuring yourself is the best solution.

This isn't really the case for the natural though as you have to think of your progress on a much longer time frame (as smart PED users will also realise) and such pushing 100% every session will eventually lead to too much degradation and fatigue that it will almost certainly lead to imjury or stalled or backwards progress when applied for long periods.

I think the only training frame work where going as hard as you want or backing off when you want works well, is when you are training with great frequency.

If you are squatting 7 days a week a missed session isn't really an issue.

If you deadlift every 10 days a missed or unproductive session is a big issue.
JackRevansIcon...07-11-2013 @ 14:09 
Avatar
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.'
Member 2477, 16481 posts
SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235
555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq
531 is for carpetbaggers
IrishMarcIcon...07-11-2013 @ 14:11 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
http://delhi4cats.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/carpetbagger.jpg
JCIcon...07-11-2013 @ 14:14 
Avatar
technical retard
Member 172, 36827 posts
SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335
850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq
richn said:
Its not my opinion as I dont agree with it as I believe in having a plan set. I was just seeing what you guys thought about it? If you rep out 10 instead of 5 on 70% on your last set how would that effect the next workout would you recalculate your percentages and increase the weight or go back to what you should have lifted in the first place?
Thanks for the replies


I'm no 531 expert, but I'm sure your weight increases each 4 week cycle

so when in 4 weeks time its 5s week again, the weight will have gone u (say 2.5kg) anyway
ThingIcon...07-11-2013 @ 15:10 
Avatar
a large fingered spastic that demolishes plant
Member 89, 31706 posts
SQ 260, BP 220, DL 290
770.0 kgs @ 142kgs UnEq
JackRevans said:531 is for carpetbaggers


whaaaaaaaat!!!
VinnyJonesIcon...07-11-2013 @ 15:27 
Avatar
Who said it's hardcore?
Member 3896, 847 posts
SQ 265, BP 150, DL 320
735.0 kgs @ 128kgs UnEq
JC said:
I'm no 531 expert, but I'm sure your weight increases each 4 week cycle
so when in 4 weeks time its 5s week again, the weight will have gone u (say 2.5kg) anyway


Pretty much how I understand it too and how I ran it.
JamieGIcon...07-11-2013 @ 17:07 
Avatar
Tom's CNS is better than steroids
Member 2886, 2973 posts
SQ 190, BP 122.5, DL 210
522.5 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq
There's a mental aspect too, with me anyway.

If the Russian spreadsheet says i need to squat x weight for 6 reps, I'm going to do it or die trying. If i was just training, I'd perhaps stop at what i thought was my limit of 4 reps.
hixxy1985Icon...07-11-2013 @ 17:23 
Avatar
www.grahamhicks.co.uk
Member 994, 9594 posts
SQ 330, BP 250, DL 405
985.0 kgs @ 135kgs UnEq
mapping out routines is a good idea. PPl burn it out a bit with all this percentage stuff but i think the idea is essentially a good one.
Progress is always slow, how can it not be in this game?
JackRevansIcon...07-11-2013 @ 17:31 
Avatar
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.'
Member 2477, 16481 posts
SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235
555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq
SteveIcon...07-11-2013 @ 20:23 
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam
Member 255, 3732 posts
It's curious how athletes in other sports will pay hundreds if not thousands of pounds for training schedules and coaching whilst for some reason many strength athletes feel it's unnecessary and you should just do what you feel like. I'm pretty sure strength training really isn't that simple!
walkerIcon...07-11-2013 @ 20:26 
Avatar
Does not need Advice, knows everything.
Member 3505, 3510 posts
SQ 295, BP 182.5, DL 290
767.5 kgs @ 105kgs Eq
IrishMarc said:5/3/1 isn't really a percentage programme it just gives out guidelines but encurages you to go as hard as you can every session (outside of deloads obviously).

Something like Smolov / RSR / RSM is more appropriate as an example. Both approaches work but I would heavily favour a good percentage based programme over a rep out programme any day of the week.

At the end of the day what makes the biggest diffrence to your strength level is the amount of quality volume you can get in and percentage programmes ensure you get enough of it to progress well and for a long period.

The trick in keeping it going is manipulation of what you do and knowing when to push and when to coast.

I think PED use clouds the waters on this massively when talking about which is superior.

If you enter a peroid of 12 weeks where you are guaranteed to make fast progress then of course pushing as hard as you can each session with out injuring yourself is the best solution.

This isn't really the case for the natural though as you have to think of your progress on a much longer time frame (as smart PED users will also realise) and such pushing 100% every session will eventually lead to too much degradation and fatigue that it will almost certainly lead to imjury or stalled or backwards progress when applied for long periods.

I think the only training frame work where going as hard as you want or backing off when you want works well, is when you are training with great frequency.

If you are squatting 7 days a week a missed session isn't really an issue.

If you deadlift every 10 days a missed or unproductive session is a big issue.


This guy gets it

123

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions