Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
little_a | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 19:36 | |
still a devious weightlifting bastard Member 43, 14374 posts | Cuddles said: LOL, you t**t You want me!!! | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 19:36 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Simeon said: Massive difference between wrist wraps and knee wraps. Agreed, they fit on different parts of the body for one Simeon said: Wrist wraps however just hold you wrist in position - they have no active role in increasing poundage. No, no, no, no, no. Of course they increase your poundages, why would anyone wear them if they didn't ? Maybe not in the same way as knee wraps do and maybe not by as much, but they definitely give you extra. | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 19:38 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | c**tos said:Unequipped powerlifting specifically refers to SUPPORTIVE equipment though... That's the singlet and the shoes gone then. Wrist wraps and belt are still there though. I was actually talking about my definition - not the official one. | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 19:39 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | little_a said:Does anyone think Powerlifting will be in the Olympics someday? Never in a million years | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 19:42 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Simeon said: It's really not all that complicated. Damned right it's not. You will find my bang-on-the-money definition in a previous post | ||
Shaun | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 20:16 | |
Member 1668, 1499 posts SQ 186, BP 102, DL 211499.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq | Carl said:how did he break the rules? the judges are there to make the descision, the descision was made, and the fact that 99% of lifters think its the wrong descision is almost irrelevant as a lifter you have to satisfy the judges, nothing more, nothing less He broke the rules by not squatting to the required depth. The judges' decision is irrelevant. | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 20:32 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | Shaun said: He broke the rules by not squatting to the required depth. The judges' decision is irrelevant. Rubbish. It is difficult for an equipped powerlifter to know exactly if he has hit depth or not. He therefore does his best and the referees then tell him if it was good enough or not. | ||
LessThanLuke | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 20:39 | |
his poor male ego must be crushed Member 883, 6251 posts SQ 290, BP 180, DL 420890.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | Fatpete said: Rubbish. It is difficult for an equipped powerlifter to know exactly if he has hit depth or not. He therefore does his best and the referees then tell him if it was good enough or not. Do you actually believe that? | ||
Rick | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 20:44 | |
I am a bench-only guy Member 3, 10035 posts SQ 185, BP 175, DL 235595.0 kgs @ 140kgs UnEq Administrator | Post Edited: 24.08.2011 @ 20:44 PM by Rick Anybody who's been to a competition will have witnessed people (and their support crews, as often as not) being genuinely surprised that their squats weren't deep enough. Often they clearly weren't. This is just as true of highly experienced lifters. | ||
uzalad | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 20:56 | |
not hilarious Member 1977, 159 posts SQ 150, BP 1, DL 215366.0 kgs @ 77kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 24.08.2011 @ 20:57 PM by uzalad he chooses to complete in a federation that routinely pass high squats | ||
Fatpete | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 21:04 | |
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17903 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | LessThanLuke said: Do you actually believe that? Of course. It's true | ||
Shaun | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 21:22 | |
Member 1668, 1499 posts SQ 186, BP 102, DL 211499.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq | Fatpete said: Rubbish. It is difficult for an equipped powerlifter to know exactly if he has hit depth or not. He therefore does his best and the referees then tell him if it was good enough or not. Ignorance of correct depth is no excuse. Referees in certain federations have proven many times that they are not always reliable in judging correct depth. If a lifter sees, from footage, that they have squatted high yet it was still passed, out of good sportsmanship they should renounce that lift. | ||
Rick | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 21:42 | |
I am a bench-only guy Member 3, 10035 posts SQ 185, BP 175, DL 235595.0 kgs @ 140kgs UnEq Administrator | Shaun said: If a lifter sees, from footage, that they have squatted high yet it was still passed, out of good sportsmanship they should renounce that lift. This is something that varies from sport to sport. Golfers are expected to call their knocks, cricketers now rarely walk, and footballers... don't make me laugh. And any rugby player will have been taught to play to the referee's decision, right or wrong. Nobody's going to give me a good lift retrospectively from footage, so why should I turn down a near-miss? | ||
Shaun | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 22:10 | |
Member 1668, 1499 posts SQ 186, BP 102, DL 211499.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq | Rick said: This is something that varies from sport to sport. Golfers are expected to call their knocks, cricketers now rarely walk, and footballers... don't make me laugh. And any rugby player will have been taught to play to the referee's decision, right or wrong. Nobody's going to give me a good lift retrospectively from footage, so why should I turn down a near-miss? Powerlifting should have a different ethos to those other sports, mainly because there's no money in it. There is nothing financially to gain from high squatting 1265lb or claiming a 3000lb total. The lifter, for the good of the sport, should be entirely honest about their lifts, for, as this thread and countless others show, it damages the sport. | ||
Paul_D | ... | 24-08-2011 @ 22:14 | |
Hey mate, my name is Paul Dudley Member 632, 3628 posts SQ 200, BP 155, DL 282.5637.5 kgs @ 77kgs UnEq | Shaun said: Powerlifting should have a different ethos to those other sports, mainly because there's no money in it. There is nothing financially to gain from high squatting 1265lb or claiming a 3000lb total. The lifter, for the good of the sport, should be entirely honest about their lifts, for, as this thread and countless others show, it damages the sport. I think that fairly substantial sponsorship deals might be open to 'the first man to ever total 3000lbs...'? So, there may well be a bit of money in it. Enough for humpty dumpty to get his men to put him together again should he fall off his wall. | ||