You are here: Home → Forum → Competitions → Drug's Failure at the GBPF British Classic Championship 2012
Drug's Failure at the GBPF British Classic Championship 2012
Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
This thread has been closed by a moderator. Replies are no longer possible.1234567891011121314151617181920
| 1369phil |  | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:17 |
 doesnt work hard enough in the gym Member 1492, 2138 posts SQ 170, BP 145, DL 195510.0 kgs @ 112kgs UnEq | IN | ||
| JC | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:19 |
 technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | milsy said: I think a lot of negativaty towards the fed comes from people who don't actually lift in the fed or have even been to a Comp its like two diffrent worlds I have nothing but good things to say about the gbpf Millsy, I have no "problem" with the GBPF as such I do (or should say did) however, have a problem with it being called a tested fed, when for the past 2-3 years (before now) no-one has been tested at regional or national comps (so, it was basically a "tested" fed for those who lifted internationally) I also have a problem with (what appears to me) to be the hollier than thou attitude some GBPF members on this board have towards athletes who have failed drugs tests, yet the GBPF has officials who have tmemseleves tested positive in the past | ||
| force10 | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:20 |
 Drugs cheat Member 3860, 630 posts SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Tom_Martin said:Terrible form............. Yes you do have Tom!! Especially when you think comenting on something you know nothing about and you dont compete and havent done for some while, like I have said earlier it silly people like yourself that make GBPF the Fed to avoid. If you have something sensible or constructive to say on the matter say it dont try and ruin the look of the best Federation the country has. | ||
| Tom_Martin | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:21 |
 No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | force10 said: Lets be sensible shall we. Are you realy under the illusion that the human body is caperble of lifting numbers like even yours without any assistance yet alone over 300kg bench whether its equiped or not. I think its spupid comment like yours and others that make PL and GBPF the place to avoid and theres nothing worse than seing a federation discussed in such a damaging manner by people who dont know and are not a part of it, even though im no longer a part of it myself. Really? I'd like you to explain how I have made GBPF look bad with the above statement... Personally, I think responding to your ban by trying to drag under other lifters who haven't tested positive is the most harmful thing anyone has done towards GBPF in this thread, but thankfully no one in their right mind will take what you said seriously. | ||
| JohnGym | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:21 |
 Hamstrings feel activated. Member 1107, 6964 posts SQ 220, BP 152.5, DL 252.5625.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 05.11.2012 @ 12:24 PM by JohnGym For clarity Force10..Did you just accuse Tom, and others of similar strength, of being on PED'S? | ||
| chaos | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:23 |
 An amazing human being Member 2047, 17156 posts SQ 262.5, BP 170, DL 300732.5 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | bryce said:http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/047/718/InBef... In before the lick? I don't get it!!! | ||
| Tom_Martin | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:23 |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | force10 said: Yes you do have Tom!! Especially when you think comenting on something you know nothing about and you dont compete and havent done for some while, like I have said earlier it silly people like yourself that make GBPF the Fed to avoid. If you have something sensible or constructive to say on the matter say it dont try and ruin the look of the best Federation the country has. Openly trying to discredit your accusations towards other GBPF members does not make GBPF look bad. Getting banned and then trying to drag under the rest of GBPF with you makes GBPF look bad. | ||
| walker | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:23 |
 Does not need Advice, knows everything. Member 3505, 3510 posts SQ 295, BP 182.5, DL 290767.5 kgs @ 105kgs Eq | A bit of roid rage from Force10 here... Oh and he's still not answered my questions on what he took.. I smell bulls**t. | ||
| chaos | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:24 |
An amazing human being Member 2047, 17156 posts SQ 262.5, BP 170, DL 300732.5 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | walker said:The sale of Jack3D and all products containing DMAA are now banned by MHRA in the UK. So in effect it is not an OTC legal supplement now anyway. Really? When was it banned? And why? Its s**t - sorry beyond s**t - or was it banned for being s**t? | ||
| JC | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:25 |
technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | walker said:A bit of roid rage from Force10 here... Oh and he's still not answered my questions on what he took.. I smell bulls**t. does he need to.........  dont think he owes anyone an explanantion TBH he's been banned....that should be the end of it IMO | ||
| walker | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:26 |
Does not need Advice, knows everything. Member 3505, 3510 posts SQ 295, BP 182.5, DL 290767.5 kgs @ 105kgs Eq | chaos said: Really? When was it banned? And why? Its s**t - sorry beyond s**t - or was it banned for being s**t? Banned in August. Aparently it's dangerous and has been linked to heart attacks. | ||
| walker | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:30 |
Does not need Advice, knows everything. Member 3505, 3510 posts SQ 295, BP 182.5, DL 290767.5 kgs @ 105kgs Eq | JC said: does he need to......... dont think he owes anyone an explanantion TBH he's been banned....that should be the end of it IMO I disagree.. We have someone from the GBPF saying there are anabolic agents present unaccounted for, and he has come on here and said it's all a mistake on his part as he has taken something from a 'health food shop'. Why come on here and lie about it? | ||
| Tom_Martin | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:31 |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | walker said: I disagree.. We have someone from the GBPF saying there are anabolic agents present unaccounted for, and he has come on here and said it's all a mistake on his part as he has taken something from a 'health food shop'. Why come on here and lie about it? Careful Walker, you don't want to be accused of making GBPF look bad.... | ||
| JC | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:32 |
technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | walker said: I disagree.. We have someone from the GBPF saying there are anabolic agents present unaccounted for, and he has come on here and said it's all a mistake on his part as he has taken something from a 'health food shop'. Why come on here and lie about it? Right...and your point is!? He doesnt have to justify himself to anyone on this forum If he want to lie, he can, the internet, real life...full of guys who talk s**t. Doesnt mean they have to have justification for it | ||
| Tom_Martin | | ... | 05-11-2012 @ 12:35 |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | JC said: Right...and your point is!? He doesnt have to justify himself to anyone on this forum If he want to lie, he can, the internet, real life...full of guys who talk s**t. Doesnt mean they have to have justification for it If course he has the right not to, just as everyone here has the right to want to ask about it... | ||
1234567891011121314151617181920
You are here: Home → Forum → Competitions → Drug's Failure at the GBPF British Classic Championship 2012