12345678910 ... 151617 ... 3334353637383940414243
| tokar | ... | 21-03-2007 @ 21:54 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 21.03.2007 @ 21:54 PM 21/3/07Rower 100m x 20 / 1min rests All sub 19secs Treadmill 15mins Base incline 4 speed 6 Intervals @ incline 5 speed 15 ie, running! It was quite fun actually, till I realised I was squatting heavy tomorrow and should probably not overdo it. Felt somewhat incongruous pounding the treadmill at 95kg next to several skinny girls. | ||
| littlegirlbunny | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 11:26 | |
MIA Member 7, 621 posts SQ 80, BP 45, DL 125250.0 kgs @ 55kgs UnEq | Originally posted by tokar... It was quite fun actually, till I realised I was squatting heavy tomorrow and should probably not overdo it. Felt somewhat incongruous pounding the treadmill at 95kg next to several skinny girls. Running? I'm in shock. What's the big word mean?? | ||
| Rob | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 11:30 | |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7174 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | I thought 95kg was skinny | ||
| David | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 11:43 | |
I ♥ Dr. Gillian McKeith Member 17, 742 posts SQ 0, BP 180, DL 0180.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | Originally posted by Rob... I thought 95kg was skinny | ||
| Cuddles | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 12:36 | |
Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq | Originally posted by Rob... I thought 95kg was skinny | ||
| tokar | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 21:43 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Originally posted by Olly... Originally posted by Rob... I thought 95kg was skinny It's all relative though isn't it? | ||
| tokar | ... | 22-03-2007 @ 21:50 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | 22/3/07 Squat 60x5, 80x3, 100x3, 120x3, 140x3, 155x2x4 Bench Press 60x5, 80x3, 95x3, 110x3x6 Squat 70x10, 100x10, 120x10 Shrug 70x10, 100x10, 120x10x3 The heavy squats weren't a breeze but were far from difficult - as it should be, but it's still reassuring that the heavier weights are still going OK. Need to get to 200kg before Rob! I was going to do multiple sets of 10 after the heavy work on Thursdays but this was a bit knackering so I might stick to one big set of 10, getting back up to 140ish in 5 weeks. Going to do 10 rep sets of SLDLs as well, starting tomorrow at 120. Not done it alongside conventional DLs before, but f**k it, it's only for 5 weeks: I'm going for broke. | ||
| tokar | ... | 26-03-2007 @ 18:07 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | 23/3/07 Clean & Press (1+x) 50x5, 60x3, 67.5x2x3 Barbell Row 70x5, 90x5, 110x5x5 Close Grip Bench Press 50x10, 70x5, 80x10x3 SLDL off block 60x10, 100x10, 120x10, 100x10 25 mins treadmill intervals | ||
| tokar | ... | 26-03-2007 @ 18:10 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | 25/3/07 Squat 60x5, 90x5, 110x3, 130x3, 150x1, 160x1, 170x1x2 Bench Press 60x5, 80x3, 95x3, 102.5x2x8 DB OH Press 30s x 8, 7, 6 Pull-up +15 x 12, 11, 10 Good session. Getting some decent heavy squats in - want to hit 175 for 2-3 singles the week after next and at least 165 for doubles. Also, have to concede that seated DB presses are easier - in terms of weight - than standing barbell presses. Can't understand it, but there it is. I'm still s**t at them, mind. | ||
| tokar | ... | 27-03-2007 @ 20:16 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | 27/03/07 Clean & Press 50x3x2, 60x3, 65x2, 70x2, 72.5x1x3 Deadlift 50x5, 100x3, 150x3, 175x3x2, 200x3x5, 180x2x3 DB Bench Press 45sx5x5 Machine Row 105x8, 120x8x5 | ||
| Rob | ... | 29-03-2007 @ 12:46 | |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7174 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | Discussion of db oh press moved to http://www.sugdenbarbell.co.uk/forum.php?a=328 | ||
| tokar | ... | 29-03-2007 @ 19:07 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | 29/3/07 Squat 60x5, 100x3, 120x2x10 (Might have been 12 sets, can't remember now) Bench Press 60x3, 80x3, 95x3, 110x2, 120x3x5 Excellent work!! This was the best bench day in ages. Was planning to do 120x2x3 but the first set was so easy I added another rep and just carried on. Could probably have got 4 reps on at least the first three sets. If I had the same "PB" philosophy as some people around here I would definitely be writing it here. Shrug 60x10, 90x10, 120x10, 140x10x3 Barbell/EZ-Bar Curl (Pump 'n' tone giant set) 40x10, 35x10, 30x10, 25x10, 20x10 Feeling good about things right now. | ||
| Sparrow | ... | 29-03-2007 @ 19:30 | |
always lookIng for the extra UT2 work. Member 9, 18279 posts SQ 255, BP 167.5, DL 330752.5 kgs @ 103kgs Eq | If I had the same "PB" philosophy as some people around here I would definitely be writing it here You don't know do you? While you've been away we decided (unanimously) that 'volume pb's' are not allowed, so it is definitely not a PB. Rep pb's (for most weight obviously) and singles are only allowed on this website. Just thought I should let you in on that one. Pop over to my log to see some of them. Only playing with you mate - good work! Can't remember if it was 10 or 12 sets on the squats!!!? s**t, I wouldn't be able to count past 2! | ||
| Rob | ... | 29-03-2007 @ 20:19 | |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7174 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | Good post Millsy. Nobody is really abusing the PB system at the minute. Even Rick! Don't get the ones in my log confused with volume PBs - they are genuine ones; just because I do multiple sets of them doesn't change that!! | ||
| tokar | ... | 29-03-2007 @ 20:35 | |
Невыносимо Высокомерный (RIP) Member 11, 965 posts SQ 190, BP 140, DL 255585.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Originally posted by Rob... Good post Millsy. Nobody is really abusing the PB system at the minute. Even Rick! Don't get the ones in my log confused with volume PBs - they are genuine ones; just because I do multiple sets of them doesn't change that!! Ah, this must have been what threw me! I had witnessed the entirely justified banning of spurious so-called volume PBs, but somebody's log had led me to believe they were still at large. For the record though, my previous best with 120 was 3,3,2 - and that was at a time when my bench was going fairly well. It's odd having such a good day all of a sudden - cos I was expecting to have to work really hard just to get back to where I was before the 3x3 scuppered things. Then again, maybe the volume in the 3x3 did actually lay a good foundation that just needed building on with heavier weights again - but it's impossible to be able to judge that. | ||
12345678910 ... 151617 ... 3334353637383940414243