Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
DomRedshaw | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 16:52 | |
Uk limbo dancing champion Member 2666, 6551 posts SQ 202, BP 170, DL 255627.0 kgs @ 88kgs UnEq | i think sumo shud stay out of strongman. main reason being it will get to the point were we have dwarfs pulling 18" deads sumo style n locking out with the bar bending an inch but the weight not breaking the floor lol | ||
martinb | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 16:53 | |
Grass fed Member 1147, 7710 posts SQ 220, BP 185, DL 272.5677.5 kgs @ 113kgs UnEq | DomRedshaw said:i think sumo shud stay out of strongman. main reason being it will get to the point were we have dwarfs pulling 18" deads sumo style n locking out with the bar bending an inch but the weight not breaking the floor lol Jnr, a Scottish strongman, is 5 ft 4, he sometimes has to put mats down for high holds or else he won't break the floor | ||
IrishMarc | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 16:54 | |
no really Irish Member 1196, 5908 posts SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq | dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts. (PMID:10912892) Abstract Citations BioEntities Related Articles Escamilla RF, Francisco AC, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Welch CM, Kayes AV, Speer KP, Andrews JR Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. rescamil@duke.edu Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise [2000, 32(7):1265-1275] Type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00013 Abstract Highlight Terms Species(1) PURPOSE: Strength athletes often employ the deadlift in their training or rehabilitation regimens. The purpose of this study was to quantify kinematic and kinetic parameters by employing a three-dimensional analysis during sumo and conventional style deadlifts. METHODS: Two 60-Hz video cameras recorded 12 sumo and 12 conventional style lifters during a national powerlifting championship. Parameters were quantified at barbell liftoff (LO), at the instant the barbell passed the knees (KP), and at lift completion. Unpaired t-tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare all parameters. RESULTS: At LO and KP, thigh position was 11-16 degrees more horizontal for the sumo group, whereas the knees and hips extended approximately 12 degrees more for the conventional group. The sumo group had 5-10 degrees greater vertical trunk and thigh positions, employed a wider stance (70 +/- 11 cm vs 32 +/- 8 cm), turned their feet out more (42 +/- 8 vs 14 +/- 6 degrees). and gripped the bar with their hands closer together (47 +/- 4 cm vs 55 +/- 10 cm). Vertical bar distance, mechanical work, and predicted energy expenditure were approximately 25-40% greater in the conventional group. Hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle dorsiflexor moments were generated for the sumo group, whereas hip extensor, knee extensor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor moments were generated for the conventional group. Ankle and knee moments and moment arms were significantly different between the sumo and conventional groups, whereas hip moments and moments arms did not show any significantly differences. Three-dimensional calculations were more accurate and significantly different than two-dimensional calculations, especially for the sumo deadlift. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical differences between sumo and conventional deadlifts result from technique variations between these exercises. Understanding these differences will aid the strength coach or rehabilitation specialist in determining which deadlift style an athlete or patient should employ. | ||
brownbear | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 16:56 | |
Morrisons - rump - 7£ Member 2206, 11578 posts SQ 228, BP 150, DL 260638.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq | davycummings said: WRONG Mega hitch deadlift moves point A to point B, ie floor to standing up Sumo moves from point A to somewhere well short of point B, as you are never properly stood up. Martin's suggestion about moving the feet in should be a requirement for all sumo lifting as it is imo. Would you allow someone to pull the truck 3/4 of the course and call it good? I see what you say, but even conventional stance widths vary greatly. Brian shaws conv stance is wider than ed coans sumo but his hands are outside | ||
davycummings | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 17:00 | |
he's got betty davis eyes Member 1684, 6001 posts SQ 250, BP 186, DL 291727.0 kgs @ 118kgs UnEq | brownbear said: I see what you say, but even conventional stance widths vary greatly. Brian shaws conv stance is wider than ed coans sumo but his hands are outside Yes, but shaw's feet are still pretty much shoulder width apart, he is just massive | ||
RossA | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 21:35 | |
i love food Member 1042, 441 posts SQ 265, BP 212.5, DL 325802.5 kgs @ 129.1kgs UnEq | i like to watch arguably "the strongest man that's ever lived" Big Z, Strict press and conv. deadlift more than everyone. In 2010 when Big Z and Misha went head-to-head on the log no one can debate Z's lifts were more impressive feats of "strength". But i doubt you could do a proper jerk in strongman on a log. Also, misha can't apply his awesome cleaning ability to a log or axle. That said i agree that in strongman, as long as your not using a regular bar you can lift OH anyway but deadlift is deadlift. Same start point, same end point. for me it's something like the difference between pulling from 18" or from the floor only in sumo the end point is less dist from the floor. | ||
Wayne_Cowdrey | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 22:40 | |
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22078 posts | I think the current rules regarding deads/overhead in strongman are fine, although I wouldn't have a problem with sumo being allowed on standard height deads. | ||
baldt | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 22:59 | |
Member 1589, 1219 posts SQ 300, BP 260, DL 345905.0 kgs @ 108kgs Eq | IrishMarc said:dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts. (PMID:10912892) Abstract Citations BioEntities Related Articles Escamilla RF, Francisco AC, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Welch CM, Kayes AV, Speer KP, Andrews JR Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. rescamil@duke.edu Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise [2000, 32(7):1265-1275] Type: Journal Article DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00013 Abstract Highlight Terms Species(1) PURPOSE: Strength athletes often employ the deadlift in their training or rehabilitation regimens. The purpose of this study was to quantify kinematic and kinetic parameters by employing a three-dimensional analysis during sumo and conventional style deadlifts. METHODS: Two 60-Hz video cameras recorded 12 sumo and 12 conventional style lifters during a national powerlifting championship. Parameters were quantified at barbell liftoff (LO), at the instant the barbell passed the knees (KP), and at lift completion. Unpaired t-tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare all parameters. RESULTS: At LO and KP, thigh position was 11-16 degrees more horizontal for the sumo group, whereas the knees and hips extended approximately 12 degrees more for the conventional group. The sumo group had 5-10 degrees greater vertical trunk and thigh positions, employed a wider stance (70 +/- 11 cm vs 32 +/- 8 cm), turned their feet out more (42 +/- 8 vs 14 +/- 6 degrees). and gripped the bar with their hands closer together (47 +/- 4 cm vs 55 +/- 10 cm). Vertical bar distance, mechanical work, and predicted energy expenditure were approximately 25-40% greater in the conventional group. Hip extensor, knee extensor, and ankle dorsiflexor moments were generated for the sumo group, whereas hip extensor, knee extensor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor moments were generated for the conventional group. Ankle and knee moments and moment arms were significantly different between the sumo and conventional groups, whereas hip moments and moments arms did not show any significantly differences. Three-dimensional calculations were more accurate and significantly different than two-dimensional calculations, especially for the sumo deadlift. CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical differences between sumo and conventional deadlifts result from technique variations between these exercises. Understanding these differences will aid the strength coach or rehabilitation specialist in determining which deadlift style an athlete or patient should employ. strong sample size | ||
baldt | ... | 17-10-2012 @ 23:12 | |
Member 1589, 1219 posts SQ 300, BP 260, DL 345905.0 kgs @ 108kgs Eq | DomRedshaw said:i think sumo shud stay out of strongman. main reason being it will get to the point were we have dwarfs pulling 18" deads sumo style n locking out with the bar bending an inch but the weight not breaking the floor lol even Stanaszek doesnt do sumo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BOl7ThV2vE | ||
FAT_SAM | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 03:34 | |
more like 'FAT TROLL' Member 984, 6331 posts SQ 420, BP 260, DL 3351015.0 kgs @ 165kgs UnEq | Hitching is gay, not a proper deadlift IMO. A clean sumo pull is a proper deadlift on the other hand. Overhead jerks are for people with no shoulders and triceps. I like old school strict pressing, pure power. I don't like suits in strongman, too much of an added kit expense. If you want to lift in kit do equipped PL, which I respect as a sport. Might I add that I get NOTHING out of a deadlift suit or a hitch (annoying when I can pull 315 to PL standards raw and guys that pull 270-280 to PL standards raw would beat me in a strongman comp where such luxuries are allowed). Jerks being allowed allow people who aren't strong to perform to a decent level in overhead events. | ||
IrishMarc | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 08:07 | |
no really Irish Member 1196, 5908 posts SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq | baldt said: strong sample size Still a 3D biomechanical analysis of 24 lifters carries a bit more weight then the "Your a dick and your wrong because my mate herpty derp did this" counter argument. | ||
davycummings | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 08:24 | |
he's got betty davis eyes Member 1684, 6001 posts SQ 250, BP 186, DL 291727.0 kgs @ 118kgs UnEq | IrishMarc said: Still a 3D biomechanical analysis of 24 lifters carries a bit more weight then the "Your a dick and your wrong because my mate herpty derp did this" counter argument. Agreed, and a 25-40% reduction in energy expentature is a lot, I thought 25%ish towards the upper limit, so I am even more convinced, no sumo. | ||
martinb | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 08:29 | |
Grass fed Member 1147, 7710 posts SQ 220, BP 185, DL 272.5677.5 kgs @ 113kgs UnEq | FAT_SAM said:Hitching is gay, not a proper deadlift IMO. A clean sumo pull is a proper deadlift on the other hand. Overhead jerks are for people with no shoulders and triceps. I like old school strict pressing, pure power. I don't like suits in strongman, too much of an added kit expense. If you want to lift in kit do equipped PL, which I respect as a sport. Might I add that I get NOTHING out of a deadlift suit or a hitch (annoying when I can pull 315 to PL standards raw and guys that pull 270-280 to PL standards raw would beat me in a strongman comp where such luxuries are allowed). Jerks being allowed allow people who aren't strong to perform to a decent level in overhead events. my first big comp had a caveman press, ie press on a normal bar from behind the neck at the time I had a strict press of under 100kgs, but practised this and came up with a bas***dised jerk I jerked 150, beating guys who basically strict pressed 140. At the time I thought that it was their fault for not learning the tech, but now I'm thinking it just didn't test strength, and isn't that what strongman should do? | ||
davycummings | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 08:42 | |
he's got betty davis eyes Member 1684, 6001 posts SQ 250, BP 186, DL 291727.0 kgs @ 118kgs UnEq | martinb said: my first big comp had a caveman press, ie press on a normal bar from behind the neck at the time I had a strict press of under 100kgs, but practised this and came up with a bas***dised jerk I jerked 150, beating guys who basically strict pressed 140. At the time I thought that it was their fault for not learning the tech, but now I'm thinking it just didn't test strength, and isn't that what strongman should do? This is a good point i guess. I cant jerk well, so dont mind if they drop it, none of the current records are jerked anyway, so it would make no difference to that. If I was poosed with the choice of dropping jerks, or allowing sumo, i would be dropping the jerk in a heartbeat | ||
FAT_SAM | ... | 18-10-2012 @ 08:52 | |
more like 'FAT TROLL' Member 984, 6331 posts SQ 420, BP 260, DL 3351015.0 kgs @ 165kgs UnEq | Most big pressers probably couldn't get into a comfortable position to press from behind neck, Martin. I'd zero on that event personally simply because of flexibility. I agree with the point you're making though. | ||