REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 0 members and 317 guests

500kg single ply squat

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

12345

FatpeteIcon...17-09-2016 @ 18:06 
Avatar
Hyper obese Pete
Member 70, 17903 posts
SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300
827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq
Tom_Martin said:
Do you honestly, Pete, HONESTLY believe he intended to do anything but place the bar back in the rack regardless of what his feet did or didn't do?


No, I don't think that he intended to do anything other than put the bar back in the racks. I am surprised that you even considered that. Weightlifters are very prone to just dumping the bar once they have stood up with it and bodybuilders do some very strange post-squat antics. But powerlifters, always, in my experience do try to re-rack the bar. So I did think that his intentions were honourable. However considering the weight, I don't consider that a very safe way of doing so, if it goes wrong and he misses, people could get seriously damaged. I have never seen that method before, I have never seen him before, so I assumed he meant to walk it in in the conventional manner and basically just f**ked it up.
FatpeteIcon...17-09-2016 @ 18:11 
Avatar
Hyper obese Pete
Member 70, 17903 posts
SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300
827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq
Tom_Martin said:
Which is interesting, considering the depth he himself squats to and deems to be acceptable.


Now you're getting weird Tom.

I have never self refereed. It can't be done. I never know if I have passed or failed a squat until someone tells me. Personally, I am never really happy with my own depth and I do try to go as low as I can, sometimes it's low enough and sometimes it isn't. My comp squats do have a high pass rate though. My lack of depth is down to two things - I am old and fat. Two things that you have no experience of. But feel free to take the piss anyway.

Happy
FatpeteIcon...17-09-2016 @ 18:15 
Avatar
Hyper obese Pete
Member 70, 17903 posts
SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300
827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq
Wayne_Cowdrey said:I like Fatpete's attitude towards powerlifting and the concept of there being a 'correct' way of doing things based upon gentlemanly etiquette Happy


Thank you.

Rule one- Don't be a c**t.

End of rules
FatpeteIcon...17-09-2016 @ 18:18 
Avatar
Hyper obese Pete
Member 70, 17903 posts
SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300
827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq
Wayne_Cowdrey said:
I don't think stating that you think a lifter failed on a technicality belittles the display of strength on display.

I don't personally class this squat as a failure though.


Nor do I.

I only said that it could be argued that it could be classed as one.

If someone did that in a comp I was reffing I would have begrudgingly passed it, and then told the lifter that I would fail it next time. This would be on the grounds that it could hurt someone if you misjudge it.

If that makes me a s**t referee then so be it
aaron_lohanIcon...17-09-2016 @ 19:26 
Avatar
Hasn't always been a bench press specialist
Member 44, 1907 posts
SQ 252.5, BP 220, DL 210
682.5 kgs @ 83kgs Eq
Fatpete said:
Nor do I.
I only said that it could be argued that it could be classed as one.
If someone did that in a comp I was reffing I would have begrudgingly passed it, and then told the lifter that I would fail it next time. This would be on the grounds that it could hurt someone if you misjudge it.
If that makes me a s**t referee then so be it


fishing again? how are you? il be training on monday are the sunday sessions on for next week?
ChrisMcCarthyIcon...17-09-2016 @ 19:27 
Lost his pen, then found his pen. #phew
Member 4899, 2956 posts
Out of interest - how much leeway as Referees and Jury do you get when deciding whether something is safe? I assume if a lifter was doing anything in a "dangerous" manner that would trump any other rule and the Jury could potentially even exclude the lifter?
aaron_lohanIcon...17-09-2016 @ 19:31 
Avatar
Hasn't always been a bench press specialist
Member 44, 1907 posts
SQ 252.5, BP 220, DL 210
682.5 kgs @ 83kgs Eq
ChrisMcCarthy said:Out of interest - how much leeway as Referees and Jury do you get when deciding whether something is safe? I assume if a lifter was doing anything in a "dangerous" manner that would trump any other rule and the Jury could potentially even exclude the lifter?


i have seen a lifter dump 350 kg and get a warning. i have never known a lifter get disqualified for something that was deemed unsafe.
AMH_PowerIcon...17-09-2016 @ 19:58 
we ride at dawn
Member 4363, 1442 posts
SQ 310, BP 250, DL 320
880.0 kgs @ 104kgs UnEq
Tom_Martin said:"Bona fide" - From the Latin bona fide (“in good faith”)
"In good faith - This is often thought to require sincere, honest intentions or belief, regardless of the outcome of an action.
"Attempt" - Make an effort to achieve or complete

Do you honestly, Pete, HONESTLY believe he intended to do anything but place the bar back in the rack regardless of what his feet did or didn't do?

The implication that he did not intend to put the bar in the rack would suggest that by tipping forwards, he hoped he would smash his face into the floor with 500kg on his back. I would like to think even the most unreasonable of characters would safely presume this NOT to be the case.


Just spat my rockstar out. f**king pmsl!
scruffmcbuffIcon...17-09-2016 @ 20:47 
Lovely ass Congrats.
Member 5958, 2315 posts
SQ 280, BP 170, DL 300
750.0 kgs @ 138kgs UnEq
I feel like pete is getting a rough ride for this.

Blaine does fall forward. any ref would be forgiven for hitting the red in reaction to watching a lifter whom starts to fall over!
ChrisMcCarthyIcon...17-09-2016 @ 20:57 
Lost his pen, then found his pen. #phew
Member 4899, 2956 posts
aaron_lohan said:
i have seen a lifter dump 350 kg and get a warning. i have never known a lifter get disqualified for something that was deemed unsafe.


Yes, I can't think of an example this isn't strictly prohibited by the rules off the top of my head, either - but I presume the option to must exist / be appropriate at some point.
scruffmcbuffIcon...17-09-2016 @ 21:06 
Lovely ass Congrats.
Member 5958, 2315 posts
SQ 280, BP 170, DL 300
750.0 kgs @ 138kgs UnEq
ChrisMcCarthy said:
Yes, I can't think of an example this isn't strictly prohibited by the rules off the top of my head, either - but I presume the option to must exist / be appropriate at some point.


In the fed i lift in intentionaly dumping the bar results in a warning and then if it happens again a ban from comp.
Tom_MartinIcon...18-09-2016 @ 04:08 
Avatar
No one believed him anyway.
Member 958, 11411 posts
SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425
1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq
Fatpete said:
No, I don't think that he intended to do anything other than put the bar back in the racks.


Then, by the very definition of the rule which you are using as grounds to possibly red light the lift, you are admitting that no breach has been made.
Tom_MartinIcon...18-09-2016 @ 04:19 
Avatar
No one believed him anyway.
Member 958, 11411 posts
SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425
1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq
Fatpete said:
Now you're getting weird Tom.
I have never self refereed. It can't be done. I never know if I have passed or failed a squat until someone tells me. Personally, I am never really happy with my own depth and I do try to go as low as I can, sometimes it's low enough and sometimes it isn't. My comp squats do have a high pass rate though. My lack of depth is down to two things - I am old and fat. Two things that you have no experience of. But feel free to take the piss anyway.
Happy


I thought you might have appreciated that the unreasonable criticism of your squats that get passed within the stated rules was a light hearted reaction to your criticism of someone else's squat which would deserve to be passed within the rules also, but it would appear by the defensive stance you have taken that you didn't quite "get it".
Tom_MartinIcon...18-09-2016 @ 04:30 
Avatar
No one believed him anyway.
Member 958, 11411 posts
SQ 410, BP 215, DL 425
1050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq
Fatpete said:
Personally, I am never really happy with my own depth and I do try to go as low as I can, sometimes it's low enough and sometimes it isn't. My lack of depth is down to two things - I am old and fat.


As a matter of curiosity, if there were technical changes you could make that would allow you to reach a depth that you are happy with, would you be willing to explore those, or would you stubbornly stick with what you believe to be right and hide behind your age and weight? For example, a higher bar position almost universally allows better depth to be achieved, but from previous conversations I am left feeling like you wouldn't entertain such an idea. I would take some interest in exploring whether or not your issues truly were due to being "old and fat" with no possible way to work around them.
little_aIcon...18-09-2016 @ 09:05 
Avatar
still a devious weightlifting bastard
Member 43, 14374 posts
https://media.giphy.com/media/14qa6jf3Xf6ftu/giphy.gif

12345

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions