Very sad story...
Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
This thread has been closed by a moderator. Replies are no longer possible.
IrishMarc said:
And there lies your bias why is a dog of more worth than a cow, sheep or pig? You just have an emotional attachment to them. Dogs are working animals in some countries and when they loose their economic value or become an economic burden the are culled like any other animal.
In korea Dogs are a food stuff does that make Korean's evil for eating dogs? No more evil than you for eating cows it's just another culture.
Your logic of decrying the death of dogs is only consistent with in itself if you think the killing of any animal is evil.
And there lies your bias why is a dog of more worth than a cow, sheep or pig? You just have an emotional attachment to them. Dogs are working animals in some countries and when they loose their economic value or become an economic burden the are culled like any other animal.
In korea Dogs are a food stuff does that make Korean's evil for eating dogs? No more evil than you for eating cows it's just another culture.
Your logic of decrying the death of dogs is only consistent with in itself if you think the killing of any animal is evil.
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
MrSmall03/02/11 @ 12:09
bignige1986 said:
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
But cows, chickens, pigs are ok?
bignige1986 said:
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
epic disrespect of logic, well done
MrSmall03/02/11 @ 12:10
MrSmall03/02/11 @ 12:14
EDCLARKE said:aren't pigs supposed to be more intelligent than dogs,just less furry and more stinky!
Yes, but they are actually very clean animals, they turn over the straw in the bedding every day, and only roll around in mud to stay cool.
EDCLARKE said:aren't pigs supposed to be more intelligent than dogs,just less furry and more stinky!
Roughly as intelligent as a 3 year old
MrSmall said:There have been 2 seriously bulls**t threads lately!
Get f**ked smalls ! Ever just thought im expressing my displeasure at the cull of 100 of my favourite animals? But nooo you f**kers wanna turn everythin into a bas***d debate about what animals ita ok to kill etc..
Ok 2 can play that game, according to the bible you should only kill to EAT !!! Not coz you dont wanna spend a few quid on lookin after the animals that put food on ya table and what your livelyhood is based on
bignige1986 said:
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
Yep anyone who eats dogs are evil horrible f**kers who need a swift kick to the bo***cks
You should look into creationism, it'll suit you
Joni said:
only 800 000 000 animals a year in UK for food industry. Fish dont even get counted.
only 800 000 000 animals a year in UK for food industry. Fish dont even get counted.
Its a very fine line though Joni
Animals used for food/milk/whateva else in this country aren't purposely mistreated, they are just kept in a way that is economically viable for both the producer and the consumer
Dont get me wrong, 1000s of chickens cooped up in some s**tty little shed to produce eggs, is a pretty horrendous thing BUT......
if this were to change and you had 1000s of chicked, wondering arounf 100s of acres of land, it cost the producers more, and therefore the consumer
This kind of change cant happen overnight. Eggs cant be 1.50 for six (I dont but eggs, so dont know if thats realisitc), and then six month down the line be 6 quid for six
If we were to abolish the meat industry, as it is in the UK at the moment, I'm sure producers would lose money, some would lose their jobs, and it woul;d have a huge knock on effect for consumers
MrSmall03/02/11 @ 12:28
Lets combine two threads...
Why is eating pork not allowed by certain religions? Surely this came about due to concerns over health risks. I'm also assuming 'Kosher' and 'Hallal' foods have their roots in early food hygiene practice???
Why is eating pork not allowed by certain religions? Surely this came about due to concerns over health risks. I'm also assuming 'Kosher' and 'Hallal' foods have their roots in early food hygiene practice???
MrSmall03/02/11 @ 12:32
PAGAN said:Lets combine two threads...
Why is eating pork not allowed by certain religions? Surely this came about due to concerns over health risks. I'm also assuming 'Kosher' and 'Hallal' foods have their roots in early food hygiene practice???
Why is eating pork not allowed by certain religions? Surely this came about due to concerns over health risks. I'm also assuming 'Kosher' and 'Hallal' foods have their roots in early food hygiene practice???
Its to do with them being "dirty" animals i.e. living in "dirty" conditions, and it would not be right to eat such a dirty animal.
Doubt its for health reasons, more "purity" reasons, like not swimming on Sundays and not masturbating.
Joni said:
only 800 000 000 animals a year in UK for food industry. Fish dont even get counted.
only 800 000 000 animals a year in UK for food industry. Fish dont even get counted.
What about the fishing industry 'Discards' that's just a waste ?
bignige1986 said:
Ok 2 can play that game, according to the bible you should only kill to EAT !!!
Ok 2 can play that game, according to the bible you should only kill to EAT !!!
If you kill a heritic do you get to eat them?
