Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
gymwarrior4 | 280kg squat after strugling to unrack it lol | 30-11-2013 @ 00:55 | |
Member 3937, 87 posts SQ 300, BP 205, DL 341846.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | |||
big_mike | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 00:57 | |
Member 2723, 243 posts SQ 290, BP 200, DL 320810.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq | Nice squat, strong, but you were quite a way off parallel by the look of it. Don't shoot the messenger | ||
paddymc1986 | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 01:02 | |
dieting is not the way to go Member 1539, 5526 posts SQ 330, BP 230, DL 350910.0 kgs @ 135kgs UnEq | Strong squat pickoff just looked a little high that's all | ||
gymwarrior4 | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 01:03 | |
Member 3937, 87 posts SQ 300, BP 205, DL 341846.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | big_mike said:Nice squat, strong, but you were quite a way off parallel by the look of it. cheers I my self thought it was ok for a training squat but it is some thing I can work onDon't shoot the messenger | ||
LessThanLuke | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 01:05 | |
his poor male ego must be crushed Member 883, 6251 posts SQ 290, BP 180, DL 420890.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 30.11.2013 @ 01:05 AM by LessThanLuke gymwarrior4 said: cheers I my self thought it was ok for a training squat but it is some thing I can work on Its very high mate but as always strong as an ox. | ||
gymwarrior4 | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 01:08 | |
Member 3937, 87 posts SQ 300, BP 205, DL 341846.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | cheers guys il defo work on depth | ||
Aquarian | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 01:21 | |
Member 2782, 456 posts SQ 262.5, BP 195, DL 310767.5 kgs @ 113kgs UnEq | I would put the bar on the next level down in the rack and bring my hands in closer - both should make it easier to unrack and control the bar on your back. | ||
chaos | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 06:46 | |
An amazing human being Member 2047, 17156 posts SQ 262.5, BP 170, DL 300732.5 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Who the sexy bloke in boots spotting you? | ||
dr_hazbun | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 07:05 | |
tabbouleh and fattoush salads were very refreshing Member 267, 8548 posts SQ 220, BP 165, DL 250635.0 kgs @ 90kgs Eq | I thought you did very well to squat it after such a shaky walkout. Calling it very high is a bit harsh IMO. Yes, I'd fail it on depth but you're not far off. | ||
stephen9069 | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 07:17 | |
Frequents the HOUSE of GAIN. Member 3836, 4233 posts SQ 225, BP 200, DL 300725.0 kgs @ 119kgs UnEq | Strong work mate | ||
PaulSavage | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 07:29 | |
Member 2775, 6927 posts | Yeah very high is harsh imo. It actually looks like you pretty much sunk it it's just that your knees went forward a lot. If you sit back you'll hit depth a lot easier. | ||
AdamT | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 13:22 | |
AKA the great reset Member 4056, 5207 posts | Wasn't that far off depth tbh strong squat | ||
paddymc1986 | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 14:46 | |
dieting is not the way to go Member 1539, 5526 posts SQ 330, BP 230, DL 350910.0 kgs @ 135kgs UnEq | Depth wasn't that bad! luke's just a c**t | ||
LessThanLuke | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 18:43 | |
his poor male ego must be crushed Member 883, 6251 posts SQ 290, BP 180, DL 420890.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | paddymc1986 said:Depth wasn't that bad! luke's just a c**t You aren't wrong we shall have to agree to disagree regarding depth guys. No biggie. | ||
Thing | ... | 30-11-2013 @ 18:49 | |
a large fingered spastic that demolishes plant Member 89, 31706 posts SQ 260, BP 220, DL 290770.0 kgs @ 142kgs UnEq | Nice, and no way your failing that we big Jay behind you | ||