Dennis Rodman
Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
| Benfrancis1993 |  | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 15:00 |
 Cut toe in half = bad day. Member 4359, 3581 posts SQ 270, BP 140, DL 310720.0 kgs @ 137kgs UnEq | ianakajohn said: Nah not having that. I think you might like being oppressed by a female lol You squat high every week | ||
| ianakajohn | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 15:10 |
 Member 4188, 2081 posts SQ 205, BP 135, DL 250590.0 kgs @ 94.5kgs UnEq | Benfrancis1993 said: You squat high every week lol your touchy | ||
| Benfrancis1993 | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 15:13 |
Cut toe in half = bad day. Member 4359, 3581 posts SQ 270, BP 140, DL 310720.0 kgs @ 137kgs UnEq | ianakajohn said: lol your touchy Suck a dick, or eat s**t. Purely your decision Ian. | ||
| ianakajohn | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 15:15 |
Member 4188, 2081 posts SQ 205, BP 135, DL 250590.0 kgs @ 94.5kgs UnEq | Benfrancis1993 said: Suck a dick, or eat s**t. Purely your decision Ian. haha your kinky | ||
| Simeon | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 15:23 |
 tight in the hole Member 2057, 3121 posts SQ 205, BP 140, DL 260605.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 09.01.2014 @ 15:24 PM by Simeon Cuddles said: The system is designed so to make it as unlikely as possible for an innocent person to go to prison. The compromise is that some guilty people will walk free. That is exactly how it should be. Sadly, this is far from the case. Watch a documentary called "after innocence" and you'll see. | ||
| Cuddles | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 17:02 |
 Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq Administrator | I never said innoent people dont go to prison... | ||
| CJR | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 17:35 |
 Member 4145, 1331 posts SQ 172.5, BP 115, DL 220507.5 kgs @ 100.4kgs UnEq | Staying on the topic of innocent/guilty a bit... What's the deal with the Mark Duggan verdict? Loads of people on my fb keep making comments about how it's a disgrace that the police officers who shot him went free. As far as I can tell these people only have the information presented in the media to go on (just like the rest of us), yet they're somehow in a better position to judge the guilt of the officers than a full jury? | ||
| rhinoceros | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 17:38 |
Member 5055, 95 posts SQ 180, BP 145, DL 220545.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | PaulSavage said: To be honest, i think they took one look at him and assumed he was guilty. I'm almost certain he didnt do it, was something to do with birds father where she wasnt supposed to have sex before she married and he would kill her if she did. Same thing happened with another guy who was found not quilty, the dad must have found out about tyson so she said he raped her. He never thought he would get put in prison because of who he was and made a mess of the trial / they found out about the other guy too late so couldnt be used. I think he was violent with women an bunch of bulls**t but dont think he raped her. This | ||
| Simeon | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 18:38 |
tight in the hole Member 2057, 3121 posts SQ 205, BP 140, DL 260605.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Cuddles said:I never said innoent people dont go to prison... No, you said: "The system is designed so to make it as unlikely as possible for an innocent person to go to prison." IMO there is far too much prejudice, corruption, ignorance and downright laziness in the US justice system for that to be the case. | ||
| Cuddles | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 19:37 |
Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq Administrator | Well in that case what you originally said is wrong. You are talking about the application of the system, rather than the system itself. Do you believe that the UK Criminal Justice System is victim to the same problems? The concept of a trial by jury, where someone is innocent until proven guilty, will lead to guilty people walking free, was my point. That is all. | ||
| Cuddles | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 19:38 |
Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq Administrator | And your first post proposes a statement of fact, your second an opinion. | ||
| Simeon | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 20:38 |
tight in the hole Member 2057, 3121 posts SQ 205, BP 140, DL 260605.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 09.01.2014 @ 20:40 PM by Simeon Cuddles said:Well in that case what you originally said is wrong. You are talking about the application of the system, rather than the system itself. Do you believe that the UK Criminal Justice System is victim to the same problems? The concept of a trial by jury, where someone is innocent until proven guilty, will lead to guilty people walking free, was my point. That is all. I think that if the system truly was designed to protect innocent people, it would be much more difficult to apply the system in ways that pervert this. I don't really know about enough about the UK criminal justice system to make a conclusion about it. I chose to add that it was my opinion in the second post as I don't want to pretend I know alot about these things - it's simply a conclusion that I have come to from what I have read/watched from a couple of sources  But you're right the overall concept of a jury etc at its most basic level is of course to protect the innocent. I just think it's an interesting topic. | ||
| JackRevans | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 21:13 |
 'There was also a sausage in my mouth.' Member 2477, 16481 posts SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq | Cuddles said: The system is designed so to make it as unlikely as possible for an innocent person to go to prison. The compromise is that some guilty people will walk free. That is exactly how it should be. I quite like you | ||
| rian1987 | | ... | 09-01-2014 @ 21:50 |
not stating facts. Member 3100, 502 posts | Everyone knows OJ did it, he just hired the best team of lawyers in the USA to get him off! The police didn't do their job properly as well! He was found guilty in a civil court! | ||