Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
Voice_of_Reason | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 11:36 | |
banned for being a useless prick Member 803, 56 posts | Post Edited: 24.08.2009 @ 11:39 AM by Voice_of_Reason It's a rolled-up knee wrap, apparently.I assume he'll get disqualified because it was 2.5m in length and not the regulation 2m? | ||
Boar | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 11:41 | |
Walk your talk Member 5, 25560 posts Administrator | Steve said: Even more funny than the squats that were passed at this meet? http://i31.tinypic.com/35hpk6e.jpg LOL, is that not just a massive boner ? i LOVE IT !! | ||
MrSmall | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 11:42 | |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | Cricket_Fire said: If he really wants to prove how good he is he needs to lift in a proper federation. Proper according to who? The purists who think powerlifting should be strictly raw? Or the IPF guys who thinks single ply is a good spot to draw the line? Or the multi-ply guys who feel like it should be all-or-nothing? I think tieing an all-time 242 record @ 198.. he's already proven he isn't a slouch under the bar. I completely agree that the squats deffinatly weren't in, but suggesting powerlifing is a joke, it's killing itself, Frankl's a joke, multi-ply is a joke, American powerlifting is a joke, etc. is a slap in the face to those who lift legitimately under the same rules. You're joke!!!!!!!oneoneoneone | ||
bhamstaff | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 14:48 | |
the best deadlifter, just smaller numbers Member 469, 1131 posts SQ 280, BP 200, DL 320800.0 kgs @ 116kgs UnEq | every lift was s**t | ||
moz | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 15:19 | |
Feasting on humble pie. Member 51, 1692 posts SQ 227.5, BP 185, DL 272.5685.0 kgs @ 90.4kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 24.08.2009 @ 23:03 PM by moz Steve said: Cricket_Fire said: How can you claim he tied the 242 record at 198 when the lifts clearly weren't any good? It just makes a mokery of the records and the sport.If he really wants to prove how good he is he needs to lift in a proper federation. I think tieing an all-time 242 record @ 198.. he's already proven he isn't a slouch under the bar. defo makes a mokery of his fed. As for a sport as a whole yh it can be damaging. Someone who knoows nothing about the sport often compare people in different feds. I personally think the future of PL is raw. Its extremely popular in the feds that promote it and its the easest way of comparing lifts from one fed to the nxt as you can take the equippment argument out of the equation. I know there are other varibles like belly bench, lack of depth etc. | ||
little_a | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 15:27 | |
still a devious weightlifting bastard Member 43, 14374 posts | aaron_lohan said: That isn't powerlifting its a circus act There's a difference? | ||
little_a | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 15:33 | |
still a devious weightlifting bastard Member 43, 14374 posts | moz said: I personally think the future of PL is raw. Its extremely popular in the feds that promote it and its the easest way of comparing lifts Spot on. ps corrected your spelling mistake on my quote. Hope you dont mind | ||
MattGriff | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 15:33 | |
Member 194, 3976 posts | Post Edited: 24.08.2009 @ 15:34 PM by MattGriff moz said: I personally think the futher of PL is raw. You personally think, wow! I get someone else to do my thinking for me! I will have to try that one personally for my personal self. I tried to spell check the bold word, the constructed sentence according to MS Word 2003 is I personally think the father of PL is raw or I personally think the further of PL is raw I can understand the first option, assuming the guy who invented Powerlifting has a fungal infection or something causing said raw feeling. The second option leaves me a bit baffled however. I think personally, myself and in my opinion you should leave the thinking to other people; you and thinking seems to be like trying to insert a beta max video cassette into a DVD player. Big love as always of course. | ||
Rob | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 16:01 | |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7173 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | Matt, please grow up a bit. Consider this an informal warning. | ||
MattGriff | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 16:03 | |
Member 194, 3976 posts | Rob said: Matt, please grow up a bit. Consider this an informal warning. Boo Hiss, ok I'll behave (mean!!!!) | ||
Cricket_Fire | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 18:03 | |
From Canadia Member 518, 410 posts SQ 320, BP 204, DL 250774.0 kgs @ 256kgs Eq | I was really hoping the whole Hoff thing was a misunderstanding when I first heard about it, but it's really looking bad . He was my biggest competition and the guy I thought about when training a lot to get my fired up (only 1 year older than me with way bigger lifts).. if this is what it looks like that sucks! | ||
Boar | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 18:05 | |
Walk your talk Member 5, 25560 posts Administrator | who or what are you reffering to mate ? i think you know better than to hassle the hoff !! | ||
mikeyp | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 19:10 | |
bollocks to global warming Member 475, 1735 posts SQ 200, BP 125, DL 235560.0 kgs @ 115kgs UnEq | Boar said: yea, the dude is obviously a beast ! but i can imagine getting 'stuck' with the expectations of your peers / freinds / family etc etc of making 1000lb squats ...WHAT?? your only gonna do 800lb's ???? ... It's a cross one has to bear, happens to me all the time | ||
Cricket_Fire | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 20:39 | |
From Canadia Member 518, 410 posts SQ 320, BP 204, DL 250774.0 kgs @ 256kgs Eq | Boar said: who or what are you reffering to mate ? i think you know better than to hassle the hoff !! I think he took a tip from his Baywatch co-stars and got implants.. on his sternum.. | ||
moz | ... | 24-08-2009 @ 21:56 | |
Feasting on humble pie. Member 51, 1692 posts SQ 227.5, BP 185, DL 272.5685.0 kgs @ 90.4kgs UnEq | sorry guys i meant futher D'oh done it again! Future, defo future. Get me a spell checker lol | ||