Squat depth check
Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
| Mouser |  | Squat depth check | 07-04-2009 @ 19:27 |
 Member 351, 107 posts SQ 190, BP 180, DL 255625.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 07.04.2009 @ 20:37 PM by Rob Opinions sought:http://jaycut.com/mix/51816/preview The 190 fail really sucked, but I did heavy deads yesterday and my back's feeling a bit knackered. More concerned with how crap my technique went on the attempt than failing it. | ||
| Rob | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 19:29 |
 Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7173 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | Take your jeans off for starts... unless you're the next Arnie  | ||
| Lurkio | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 19:33 |
 as deep as his fat little body will allow Member 265, 4173 posts SQ 222.5, BP 142.5, DL 235600.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Can't see it. | ||
| cuntos | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 19:50 |
 old fat fingers needs to find 10kg Member 192, 640 posts SQ 280, BP 210, DL 245735.0 kgs @ 122.7kgs Eq | First rep of 100x5 was deep enough. All other reps were a bit high, but all very close (there or thereabouts). And wearing jeans is like wearing a canvas squat suit (albeit rather a baggy one in your case). | ||
| Mouser | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 20:28 |
Member 351, 107 posts SQ 190, BP 180, DL 255625.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | The jeans are quite baggy, certainly don't provide any assistance. I have a pair of taekwondo trousers, but being white they don't really show up. Other than that it's shorts for gymwear. Lurkio, can you see other videos on that site?  | ||
| Lurkio | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 20:36 |
as deep as his fat little body will allow Member 265, 4173 posts SQ 222.5, BP 142.5, DL 235600.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Mouser said: The jeans are quite baggy, certainly don't provide any assistance. I have a pair of taekwondo trousers, but being white they don't really show up. Other than that it's shorts for gymwear. Lurkio, can you see other videos on that site? No mate, I have tried using IE & Firefox. Not to worry mate, others more experienced than I have commented and advised.  | ||
| Rob | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 20:37 |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7173 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | It will work now... | ||
| Lurkio | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 20:44 |
as deep as his fat little body will allow Member 265, 4173 posts SQ 222.5, BP 142.5, DL 235600.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Yes, it does! Rob - you are a clever chap. | ||
| MrSmall | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 21:34 |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | c**tos said: First rep of 100x5 was deep enough. All other reps were a bit high, but all very close (there or thereabouts). . Concur, but what the f**k do I know. | ||
| Mouser | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 22:43 |
Member 351, 107 posts SQ 190, BP 180, DL 255625.0 kgs @ 95kgs UnEq | Rob said: Take your jeans off for starts... unless you're the next Arnie In shorts, 140x5 | ||
| Rob | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 23:10 |
Does f*ck all for SugdenBarbell.co.uk Member 1, 7173 posts SQ 182.5, BP 110, DL 205497.5 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq Administrator | They all looked in to me, apart from rep 3 maybe, but I think you just lost your form a little on that one? | ||
| Titch | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 23:41 |
 One Sexy MoFo Member 101, 2470 posts | 1st and 2nd reps were ok, just. | ||
| barabas | | ... | 07-04-2009 @ 23:53 |
Member 619, 56 posts | Mouser, All those reps looked good to me. If you were a non-powerlifting competitor in the gym just squatting I would be throughly impressed with your depth. The angle from your fibula to femur usually needs to be atleast 90 degrees in a ppowerlifting meet and you seemed to meet that in all your reps. Very nice squatting. All too often I see people doing partial squats with way too much weight in the gym. Very nice squatting | ||
| youngy | | ... | 08-04-2009 @ 00:27 |
 crushed the generals chance of 6th place Member 588, 5477 posts SQ 200, BP 100, DL 200500.0 kgs @ 84kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 08.04.2009 @ 00:51 AM by youngy Solid squatting. All look deep enough but as rob said 3rd is a bit dodgy. (talking about the 140s in shorts by the way)Nothing wrong with working on flexiblity and depth though always, never seen anyone go too deep! Good work though! | ||
| paul_richards | | ... | 08-04-2009 @ 00:42 |
 I personally prefer the stiffest possible. Member 158, 3110 posts SQ 170, BP 107.5, DL 222.5500.0 kgs @ 67.4kgs UnEq | 140s looked in to me | ||