12345678910 ... ... 1718192021222324252627
| JC | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 14:59 | |
technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Cuddles said:When you say 'drug free', do you mean using the WADA list? Your f**ked either way, dirty coke snorting sted head | ||
| MrSmall | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 15:03 | |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | Cuddles said:When you say 'drug free', do you mean using the WADA list? In the rules it says whats banned, you're safe | ||
| JC | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 15:04 | |
technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 13.05.2010 @ 15:04 PM by JC MrSmall said: In the rules it says whats banned, you're safe Am I safe? | ||
| MrSmall | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 15:06 | |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | I don't know, read the rules Not sure if ploughman's and chocolate milk constitute growth hormone.. | ||
| Cuddles | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 15:14 | |
Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq Administrator | JC said: Your f**ked either way, dirty coke snorting sted head LOL | ||
| jamiea | ... | 13-05-2010 @ 18:52 | |
has perfected the anvil roll Member 353, 3292 posts SQ 230, BP 160, DL 275665.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | Wayne_Cowdrey said:I like the idea of competing against other naturals, but I don't think the correct level has been found yet. I don't think the weights for a natural u105 comp need to be significantly lower than for other u105 comps. Perhaps having a novice comp with the weights for the 105s then an open for all weight classes with the open weights with the highest placed 105 getting an award could be the way forward | ||
| glen_danbury | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 11:44 | |
Member 735, 1193 posts SQ 220, BP 135, DL 235590.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq | Ok we have been in talks with pardise wildlife park and look at the issues with competitor numbers and can squeeze in more head to heads on some events as such we will now uncap the competition | ||
| PeteHodgson | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 11:51 | |
Has little understanding of the sugden Member 677, 11338 posts SQ 165, BP 125, DL 220510.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq | Hi Glen, I noticed that last year you mentioned having Northern and Southern comps this year. Is this going ahead? ta | ||
| glen_danbury | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 13:14 | |
Member 735, 1193 posts SQ 220, BP 135, DL 235590.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq | unfortunately not this year - again just the one show, with the amount of time being taken up with the new nutrtion company it just wasnt practical as we have new products coming out regularly and tons of stuff to do for that next year we want to have a southern qualifier and a northern qualifier (will be looking for someones help on this one up there in the wilderness | ||
| Wayne_Cowdrey | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 13:25 | |
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22858 posts | glen_danbury said: next year we want to have a southern qualifier and a northern qualifier (will be looking for someones help on this one up there in the wilderness Good plan. You just need to up the weights! | ||
| Col_Austin | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 13:30 | |
99.8 340/220/335 895 Member 1002, 1560 posts | glen_danbury said: will probably get it registered like a federation which will then allow us to do out of comp testing as well to really try and keep it as drug free as possible Will probably get what registered with whom? | ||
| PeteHodgson | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 14:32 | |
Has little understanding of the sugden Member 677, 11338 posts SQ 165, BP 125, DL 220510.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq | glen_danbury said:unfortunately not this year - again just the one show, with the amount of time being taken up with the new nutrtion company it just wasnt practical as we have new products coming out regularly and tons of stuff to do for that next year we want to have a southern qualifier and a northern qualifier (will be looking for someones help on this one up there in the wilderness Cool. Keep up the good work. I'll look forward for next year. | ||
| strange1 | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 14:42 | |
Member 535, 618 posts SQ 267.5, BP 140, DL 275682.5 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq | Col_Austin said: Will probably get what registered with whom? WADA would be my guess | ||
| Col_Austin | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 15:02 | |
99.8 340/220/335 895 Member 1002, 1560 posts | strange1 said: WADA would be my guess I don't think sports not recognized by the national body can just sign-up and start having testing conducted by UK Sport. For independent associations, they may elect to follow the WADA code, but all testing, in and out of competition, is conducted in-house. My suggestion, if Glen wants to go down the drug-free route, is to approach the IAWA (UK) with regard to affiliation. The infra-structure for testing is already in place and as well as an affiliation fee, a proportion of entry fees would go towards testing, so no separate provision would need to be made. | ||
| JC | ... | 14-05-2010 @ 15:03 | |
technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Col_Austin said: My suggestion, if Glen wants to go down the drug-free route, is to approach the IAWA (UK) with regard to affiliation. The infra-structure for testing is already in place and as well as an affiliation fee, a proportion of entry fees would go towards testing, so no separate provision would need to be made. Col, do IAWA test outside of comps? I know quite a few guys who have competed in IAWA comps and never known them be tested out of comp? | ||
12345678910 ... ... 1718192021222324252627