| b_rex | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 15:09 | |
jogging bottoms are like sweat pants Member 935, 972 posts SQ 220, BP 120, DL 227.5567.5 kgs @ 97.6kgs UnEq | Lurkio said:This might be taking thing to a pedantic level, but what about leotards/singlets that meet all the required logo/brand name limitations etc, yet have the words; "support systems" written on them? Are they not part of the company's name? e.g. "Titan Support Systems" is the full name I think? I could wear a t-shirt with "dog" on it but unless I turn furry and start chasing my own tail it does not make me one! | ||
| Lurkio | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 15:24 | |
as deep as his fat little body will allow Member 265, 4173 posts SQ 222.5, BP 142.5, DL 235600.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | b_rex said: Are they not part of the company's name? e.g. "Titan Support Systems" is the full name I think? I could wear a t-shirt with "dog" on it but unless I turn furry and start chasing my own tail it does not make me one! It was a point raised yesterday by a couple of people at the comp I was at. | ||
| Lurkio | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 15:27 | |
as deep as his fat little body will allow Member 265, 4173 posts SQ 222.5, BP 142.5, DL 235600.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | The reason I mentioned it is because the approved equipment list refers to "supportive" equipment, so if a lifter was to wear a leotard advertising a company that was no longer on the list, would this be right? | ||
| moz | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 15:50 | |
Feasting on humble pie. Member 51, 1692 posts SQ 227.5, BP 185, DL 272.5685.0 kgs @ 90.4kgs UnEq | Im glad I give up powerlifting now | ||
| Steve | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 16:53 | |
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam Member 255, 3732 posts | robocop said: thanks for that lengthy but interesting history of powerlifting it has made me feel more sympathetic towards IPF and what they stand for and it is a shame that the sport has been so badly fragmented but i still feel that IPF are wrong to hold equipment manufacturers to ransom and every time i meet or speak to anyone associated with the IPF they come accross as pompus and condesending towards anyone who does not lift in their fed thats why i am not a fan so IPF are wanks !! sorry Generally the IPF's motives are good and it is the only genuine World Powerlifting Federation. Unfortunately it does seem highly skilled in pissing off lifters rather than trying to attract them in. Personally I see not problem with the equipment manufacturers being made to pay a licence for the right to sell their kit, but surely the lifters shouldn't suffer if the company pulls out. It has been suggested on the USAPL forum that if you have proof that you purchased your kit whilst it was still licenced you could continue to use it. If this is possible it would seem a good way of not penalising the lifter. | ||
| robocop | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 17:12 | |
Commentators say: he benches like a bodybuilder Member 231, 1873 posts SQ 400, BP 275, DL 3651040.0 kgs @ 135.7kgs Eq | i would like to see inzer titain and the rest just stick to their guns say we are not paying fee and see what happens essentually the fed is nothing without its lifters and without approved equipment how can athletes lift again i just think its pompus for a fed to charge a fee when all the others (if this is the case) dont, other feds inspect equipment and approve it or ban it without the need to charge thousands of dollars it would be nice to have official statements from all parties | ||
| Cuddles | ... | 08-02-2010 @ 18:43 | |
Eat.Cycle.Sleep.Win Member 2, 12511 posts SQ 190, BP 150, DL 280620.0 kgs @ 99kgs UnEq | I am anti the fee in general but can completely see the reasons as to why they have it so wont comment further on that. But.... I would love to see a justification for why it has doubled? | ||
| Ben_Tricky_Burgess | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 13:57 | |
Member 86, 297 posts | Steve said: Generally the IPF's motives are good and it is the only genuine World Powerlifting Federation. Unfortunately it does seem highly skilled in pissing off lifters rather than trying to attract them in. Personally I see not problem with the equipment manufacturers being made to pay a licence for the right to sell their kit, but surely the lifters shouldn't suffer if the company pulls out. It has been suggested on the USAPL forum that if you have proof that you purchased your kit whilst it was still licenced you could continue to use it. If this is possible it would seem a good way of not penalising the lifter. Steve you talk right proper eloquent sense you do mate | ||
| Joseph_Walton | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 14:05 | |
Mighty young Joe Member 675, 2271 posts SQ 272.5, BP 180, DL 275727.5 kgs @ 114.8kgs UnEq | http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/node/14440 Metal and APT have paid the fees anyway. | ||
| Joni | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 14:06 | |
left the country satisfied Member 10, 19241 posts SQ 240, BP 150, DL 270660.0 kgs @ 107kgs UnEq | hey, it gave us a nice 4 page discussion tho! | ||
| LukeC | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 15:12 | |
The one in the guns and roses teeshirt. Member 171, 2462 posts SQ 272.5, BP 140, DL 245657.5 kgs @ 80.2kgs Eq | Joseph_Walton said:http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/node/14440 Metal and APT have paid the fees anyway. But what about Craine! Oh wait, I have never even heard of them. IPF get away with screwing people over again then. | ||
| Joseph_Walton | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 15:58 | |
Mighty young Joe Member 675, 2271 posts SQ 272.5, BP 180, DL 275727.5 kgs @ 114.8kgs UnEq | True, but i've never seen anyone where a craine suit in ages, they're not a big enough company to afford the R+D the others can. | ||
| Steve | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 18:51 | |
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam Member 255, 3732 posts | LukeC said: But what about Craine! Oh wait, I have never even heard of them. IPF get away with screwing people over again then. A non-profit making organisation looking to raise a relatively small amount of money to promote and develop their activities from companies making hundreds of thousands of dollars off them. What a rip of - I don't know how they dare! | ||
| LukeC | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 19:36 | |
The one in the guns and roses teeshirt. Member 171, 2462 posts SQ 272.5, BP 140, DL 245657.5 kgs @ 80.2kgs Eq | Steve said: A non-profit making organisation looking to raise a relatively small amount of money to promote and develop their activities from companies making hundreds of thousands of dollars off them. What a rip of - I don't know how they dare! I just resent the fact they jacked up the prices so rapidly, the fact the companies have now paid up suggests it is worth it to them but even still. My problem with the ban was always the effect it had (or perhaps would have had) on lifters, the lifeblood of the sport who pay so much as it is. | ||
| Tom_Martin | ... | 09-02-2010 @ 22:18 | |
No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | great, I just binned all my metal wraps.... | ||