Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
neilakaconan | lying bench barbell row / bench press ratio | 14-02-2015 @ 11:07 | |
Member 2933, 511 posts SQ 200, BP 152.5, DL 232.5585.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Just started doing the lying on a tall bench strict barbell rows. About a month now. Anyone know if there is a strict row/bench press ratio? As your back is bigger than chest should the row number be higher? im at 70 x10 strict row Compared to 110 x 10 bench | ||
neilakaconan | ... | 16-02-2015 @ 10:44 | |
Member 2933, 511 posts SQ 200, BP 152.5, DL 232.5585.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | No data then! | ||
JackRevans | ... | 16-02-2015 @ 22:47 | |
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.' Member 2477, 16481 posts SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq | cba with rows | ||
MaxCooper | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 09:42 | |
1000 post points - NAILED Member 2026, 1344 posts SQ 195, BP 152.5, DL 235582.5 kgs @ 94kgs UnEq | rows are good, dont worry about the ratio the form differences is far too much to directly compare and it depends on lever lengths that make the ratio different to each person: probably too much analysis IMO | ||
slimsim | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 10:06 | |
My asshole is not watertight. Member 2926, 6050 posts SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq | MaxCooper said:rows are good, dont worry about the ratio the form differences is far too much to directly compare and it depends on lever lengths that make the ratio different to each person: probably too much analysis IMO Surely if you've lever are advantageous for bench then they are advantageous for rows and vice versa? I was always under the impression that your numbers should "roughly" be equal on both movements and have seen a lot of people around that split ratio, albeit on a bent over row rather than a lying row. Neil, maybe you struggled due to it being a new movement? | ||
neilakaconan | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 10:12 | |
Member 2933, 511 posts SQ 200, BP 152.5, DL 232.5585.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | slimsim said: Surely if you've lever are advantageous for bench then they are advantageous for rows and vice versa? I was always under the impression that your numbers should "roughly" be equal on both movements and have seen a lot of people around that split ratio, albeit on a bent over row rather than a lying row. Neil, maybe you struggled due to it being a new movement? Yep. It is a new one for me. That's why i wondered if the row numbers should match the bench numbers as i have no idea lol | ||
MaxCooper | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 12:08 | |
1000 post points - NAILED Member 2026, 1344 posts SQ 195, BP 152.5, DL 235582.5 kgs @ 94kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 17.02.2015 @ 12:13 PM by MaxCooper slimsim said: Surely if you've lever are advantageous for bench then they are advantageous for rows and vice versa? I was always under the impression that your numbers should "roughly" be equal on both movements and have seen a lot of people around that split ratio, albeit on a bent over row rather than a lying row. Neil, maybe you struggled due to it being a new movement? maybe on the levers but theres just no comparison between the two other than the supposed plain of movement how can you compare the BO row to anything when peoples form ranges from this to this (didnt have the sound of teh last one but from the movenment of the guy hes a douche) IMO just focus on increasing the number for both whereever they start: in bench keep the form where its competition legal if you compete and in BOR keep the form where you feel it best in where you want to build | ||
neilakaconan | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 18:03 | |
Member 2933, 511 posts SQ 200, BP 152.5, DL 232.5585.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Post Edited: 17.02.2015 @ 18:28 PM by neilakaconan Laying on a bench row is a strict row that keeps my form perfect. so not the same as in the 2 youtube clips.(Trying to find an example now......) http://instagram.com/p/zNlkqbSB08/ | ||
MaxCooper | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 19:29 | |
1000 post points - NAILED Member 2026, 1344 posts SQ 195, BP 152.5, DL 235582.5 kgs @ 94kgs UnEq | What I mean is when people say they should be a certain ratio you'll never replicate the way they did it in a way that benefits yourself as we'll in actually producing results regardless of using a bench etc as no one else is for their 'ratio' | ||
pandion | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 21:19 | |
Member 2407, 219 posts | neilakaconan said:Laying on a bench row is a strict row that keeps my form perfect. so not the same as in the 2 youtube clips. (Trying to find an example now......) http://instagram.com/p/zNlkqbSB08/ Try looking for prone rows i'm pretty sure thats what they're called | ||
IrishMarc | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 21:23 | |
no really Irish Member 1196, 5908 posts SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq | Bench row is the s**t. 130 bench row PB done in the last 12 weeks Prob 190ish bench ATM | ||
IrishMarc | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 21:24 | |
no really Irish Member 1196, 5908 posts SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XrB8lLRio0 | ||
pandion | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 21:26 | |
Member 2407, 219 posts | I remember reading that s&c coaches in the NRL used to get players to do pullups with a bench press width aiming for similar numbers with bodyweight taken into account.Was to deal with shoulder issues they came from imbalances from pressing. Imagine rows could be similar depending where you pull the bar to? | ||
neilakaconan | ... | 17-02-2015 @ 22:08 | |
Member 2933, 511 posts SQ 200, BP 152.5, DL 232.5585.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | IrishMarc said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XrB8lLRio0 I take it off pins in the rack to start so at full extension the weights can't touch the floor. Apart from that its the same exercise | ||
CJR | ... | 18-02-2015 @ 09:56 | |
Member 4145, 1331 posts SQ 172.5, BP 115, DL 220507.5 kgs @ 100.4kgs UnEq | Prone rows will always be less imo, it's a way more strict movement than a bench press! Can't use your legs, can't arch, can't bounce etc etc. | ||