| unit94 | ... | 25-11-2013 @ 23:35 | |
what is everyone's fran time? Member 3986, 10452 posts SQ 340, BP 200, DL 400940.0 kgs @ 129kgs Eq | George_Winston said: What? Jack3d apparently. | ||
| macroth | ... | 26-11-2013 @ 08:37 | |
no longer the Swiss Deadlift record holder Member 3517, 3368 posts SQ 182.5, BP 122.5, DL 255560.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Neoprene sleeves? Genetics? | ||
| slimsim | ... | 26-11-2013 @ 10:02 | |
My asshole is not watertight. Member 2926, 6051 posts SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq | on many forums merely discussing your lifts adds 20% to them. | ||
| martin | ... | 26-11-2013 @ 17:31 | |
Why not just not get fat in the first place? Member 132, 1406 posts SQ 331, BP 200, DL 320851.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq | Tom_Martin said: Strong off the floor, miss lifts at lockout? No really mate, most miss just below the knee or a few inches off the floor... I agree that using a Deadlift Bar certainly FEELS nicer to lift with, and possibly makes lift FEEL easier. But as to adding to a persons 1RM I doubt the difference in more than a couple of kgs. | ||
| LessThanLuke | ... | 26-11-2013 @ 17:57 | |
his poor male ego must be crushed Member 883, 6251 posts SQ 290, BP 180, DL 420890.0 kgs @ 105kgs UnEq | martin said: No really mate, most miss just below the knee or a few inches off the floor... I agree that using a Deadlift Bar certainly FEELS nicer to lift with, and possibly makes lift FEEL easier. But as to adding to a persons 1RM I doubt the difference in more than a couple of kgs. Agreed. I've pulled just as much a stiff bar even though it feels way worse. | ||
| brynevans | ... | 26-11-2013 @ 19:01 | |
Scotbasher - forever Member 59, 2115 posts | martin said: No really mate, most miss just below the knee or a few inches off the floor... I agree that using a Deadlift Bar certainly FEELS nicer to lift with, and possibly makes lift FEEL easier. But as to adding to a persons 1RM I doubt the difference in more than a couple of kgs. It makes me wonder why they bother using a different bar at all then? Far simpler to just have the one type? | ||