Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
IainKendrick | ... | 15-11-2013 @ 18:15 | |
some nice relaxing jazz. Member 77, 12599 posts SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq | polkovnikostin said: I can't stand Stuart McRobert. You must not be a 'hardgainer' then | ||
Dave85 | ... | 15-11-2013 @ 18:57 | |
to row or not to row ...that is the question Member 1963, 811 posts SQ 202.5, BP 140, DL 265607.5 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Cuddles said: It's actually greek for c**t. Thought it was Turkish? | ||
JimmyCobblers | ... | 15-11-2013 @ 19:55 | |
Member 4829, 11 posts SQ 227.5, BP 170, DL 281678.5 kgs @ 150kgs UnEq | Mehdi | ||
burningnun | ... | 15-11-2013 @ 20:39 | |
Member 432, 81 posts SQ 142.5, BP 82.5, DL 185410.0 kgs @ 72.2kgs UnEq | IainKendrick said: Indeed. So far we've generally had a list of online gurus or coaches whom havn't done that much in any kind of broad competitive field. I know there has been some joke answers too but some have been serious. Whether this is wrong or not depends how you define "best". Is it the guy who publically substantiates his points the most effectively and in the most detail? Is it the guy who helps the most people overall? Or is it the guy who helps a few people achieve truly exceptional feats? The first two groups are obviously dependent on publicity, and the latter is dependent on the talent of people who walk into his gym, so everything's pretty hard to define. A lot of coaches are good in one or two categories and bad in another. It would be interesting to see who people think are good in all three categories. Nobody specific immediately springs to my mind. | ||