REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 0 members and 115 guests

GBPF classic lead up with a touch of weightlifting for good measure

Users viewing topic: & 2 Guests

12345678910

CCIcon...13-06-2014 @ 23:54 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Found a video of my last competition. Looking at it, I think my weight selection for my final attempts was bang on the money. My lifts are at 0:48, 6:07, 11:13, 17:13, 21:30, 25:55, 29:11, 33:30 and 38:04.

CCIcon...16-06-2014 @ 20:58 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Training 16/06/2014

Low bar squat

70 x 3
70 x 3
100 x 2
130
150
Belt + sleeves
170
185
200
167.5 x 5
167.5 x 5
167.5 x 5

Paused bench press

Bar x 10
60 x 5
80 x 2
100
120
130
112.5 x 5
112.5 x 5
112.5 x 5

Deadlift

130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3

Squats weren't the best today but I still hit the prescribed reps. Bench felt very good today. The 130 was the best I've ever done with that sort of weight. Deadlifts felt quick and good technically. Richmond rfc were in the gym maxing out so I asked one of the guys who was overseeing it why they were all squatting very high to which he replied "because they're rugby players". He also said they wouldn't be made to squat to depth in the future either which baffles me.
JackRevansIcon...16-06-2014 @ 20:59 
Avatar
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.'
Member 2477, 16481 posts
SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235
555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq
nice total
VanillaGorillaIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:00 
Avatar
the UK's leading expert in bio mechanics
Member 1973, 7379 posts
CC said:which baffles me.


Why?
CCIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:09 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
VanillaGorilla said:
Why?


Would it not be more productive to work on the issues which were stopping them from hitting depth rather than making them max out a 1/2 squat. I would PERSONALLY rather see someone squat 100kg to full depth rather than 1/2 squat 200kg. What is your take Dave?
CCIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:09 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
JackRevans said:nice total


Thanks Jack!
VanillaGorillaIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:17 
Avatar
the UK's leading expert in bio mechanics
Member 1973, 7379 posts
CC said:
Would it not be more productive to work on the issues which were stopping them from hitting depth rather than making them max out a 1/2 squat. I would PERSONALLY rather see someone squat 100kg to full depth rather than 1/2 squat 200kg. What is your take Dave?


My take is that the work they are doing is to make them better rugby players, not better lifters.

There are so many things to take into account, not least of all what is the benefit / risk / work relationship when considering why WOULD a rugby player lift like a powerlifter?

Would it surprise you to knownthat there is at least one premiership rugby team that does no free bar work at all? Solely bodyweight movements, machines and hip belt work?
CCIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:30 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
VanillaGorilla said:
My take is that the work they are doing is to make them better rugby players, not better lifters.
There are so many things to take into account, not least of all what is the benefit / risk / work relationship when considering why WOULD a rugby player lift like a powerlifter?
Would it surprise you to knownthat there is at least one premiership rugby team that does no free bar work at all? Solely bodyweight movements, machines and hip belt work?


I agree with you're first point entirely, I still think that maxing out a 1/2 squat with mediocre form is not that productive though.

In regards to your last 2 points, it doesn't surprise me that some rugby teams don't do free bar work as in a starting strength interview with Mark Rippetoe, John Welbourn said that numerous NFL teams don't lift free weights in season so that isn't too much of a surprise ( worth a watch on youtube if you have the time). If squats are programmed into your program (with depth required not stated), is it not more beneficial to squat as deep as you can safely?
VanillaGorillaIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:39 
Avatar
the UK's leading expert in bio mechanics
Member 1973, 7379 posts
Post Edited: 16.06.2014 @ 21:44 PM by VanillaGorilla
"As deep as you can safely."

Drawing a few assumptions based on previous knowledge, you're going to have a group of athletes who will include:

Old men who have never squatted properly and don't want to.
Props with impacted spines
Players with internal rotation issues meaning they can't rack a bar
Siezed SI joints
Poor hip hinging
Tight calves from driving and high bodyweight
Tight hips
Big egos

These issues would negatively impact on being a 'lifter', but not necessarily being a rugby player. That is ultimately what they are looking to do, use lifting and aspects of lifting to improve their pitch based performances.

This group probably numbers 30 players. At this level you will have 2 coaches who might get 6-10 hours with the players a week, in a group environment.

They probably have a team of physios who spend their whole week unf**king their already f**ked bodies.

A head coach who will hit the roof if his first team players pick up injuries in the weights room.

Needs analysis that shows they need to exert force from the 'athletic position' and partial squat pattern.

With that, and much more in mind, no, they wouldn't benefit from squats done to PL standards in my opinion.
brownbearIcon...16-06-2014 @ 21:59 
Avatar
Morrisons - rump - 7£
Member 2206, 11578 posts
SQ 228, BP 150, DL 260
638.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq
VanillaGorilla said:"As deep as you can safely."

Drawing a few assumptions based on previous knowledge, you're going to have a group of athletes who will include:

Old men who have never squatted properly and don't want to.
Props with impacted spines
Players with internal rotation issues meaning they can't rack a bar
Siezed SI joints
Poor hip hinging
Tight calves from driving and high bodyweight
Tight hips
Big egos

These issues would negatively impact on being a 'lifter', but not necessarily being a rugby player. That is ultimately what they are looking to do, use lifting and aspects of lifting to improve their pitch based performances.

This group probably numbers 30 players. At this level you will have 2 coaches who might get 6-10 hours with the players a week, in a group environment.

They probably have a team of physios who spend their whole week unf**king their already f**ked bodies.

A head coach who will hit the roof if his first team players pick up injuries in the weights room.

Needs analysis that shows they need to exert force from the 'athletic position' and partial squat pattern.

With that, and much more in mind, no, they wouldn't benefit from squats done to PL standards in my opinion.



That's a good point

Dave do you think IF rugby players could safely perform full squats, they would be beneficial compared to partial squats either off season or both in and off season?
VanillaGorillaIcon...16-06-2014 @ 22:06 
Avatar
the UK's leading expert in bio mechanics
Member 1973, 7379 posts
brownbear said:
That's a good point
Dave do you think IF rugby players could safely perform full squats, they would be beneficial compared to partial squats either off season or both in and off season?


Potentially in various preperatory phases yea. I'm spoiled as I'm mostly dealing with 20 year olds with no issues, and they do benefit from full squats for the most part.
CCIcon...17-06-2014 @ 21:03 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Training 17/06/2014

High bar squats

60 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3

Paused bench press

Bar x 10
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3

SLDL

70 x 3
110
150
180
160 x 5
160 x 5
160 x 5

Squats were fine. Bench press was fine but a bit of pain in my elbows again. SLDL's felt decent today. Had to do a lot of driving these last 2 days because of work which isn't great on my lower back. Tomorrow will be the last day of having to do so, then after that back to normal.
CCIcon...18-06-2014 @ 20:18 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Training 18/06/2014

High bar squat

70 x 3
110
140
Belt + sleeves
160
177.5
192.5
175 x 3

Paused bench press

Bar x 10
60 x 3
80 x 2
100
120
132.5
117.5 x 3

My form on squats was pretty poor today. Heels nearly came off the floor on 192.5. I also had quite bad pain in my soleus when squatting today. I try and stretch it out most days but it looks like I need to do even more work on it. I had some pain in my elbows when benching today but it was manageable. Both top sets felt really good today. I also came home to find my order of the book 'The white prisoner - The secret story of Galabin Boevski' had arrived which I'm very much looking forward to reading.
CCIcon...19-06-2014 @ 20:56 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Training 19/06/2014

High bar squat

60 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3
100 x 3

Paused bench press

Bar x 10
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
78.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3
77.5 x 3

SLDL

70 x 3
115
155
185
165 x 5
165 x 5
165 x 5

Less pain today in my calves when squatting and elbows when benching but then again it is less weight. SLDL's were hard today. I think this is due to my lower back feeling like s**t after driving for about 3 hours each day. Tomorrow is definitely my last day of having to travel to Henley each day though.
CCIcon...20-06-2014 @ 19:51 
Member 3720, 1113 posts
SQ 237.5, BP 160, DL 272.5
670.0 kgs @ 120kgs UnEq
Training 20/06/2014

Low bar squat

70 x 3
100 x 2
130
150
Belt + sleeves
170
190
205
167.5 x 5
167.5 x 5
167.5 x 5
167.5 x 5

Paused bench press

Bar x 10
60 x 3
80 x 2
100
120
127.5 x 2 (pb)
112.5 x 5
112.5 x 5
112.5 x 5
112.5 x 5

Deadlift

130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3
130 x 3

On the drive to the gym I manufactured myself a lower back support in the form of a pair of rolled up trackie bottoms so when I arrived, I had no back pain at all which is excellent. I do however have to go back in on Monday which is very frustrating seeing as I was only meant to be there Monday and Tuesday this week! On the plus side I do get paid more. So squats were good today, nothing spectacular but all reps were solid. The double on bench was an all time pb and I did it paused. Sets on 112.5 were ok. Deadlifts were quick.

12345678910

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions