12345678910 ... ... 5152535455565758596061
» Now that's what I call mediocrity 7 (Go to post) | 10-12-2010 @ 09:51 | ||
Cheers Wayne. Things are slowly returning to where I want them | |||
» Now that's what I call mediocrity 7 (Go to post) | 10-12-2010 @ 09:39 | ||
09/12/10 Late one yesterday - after work. None too keen on that I can tell you Deads 100 x 3 100 x 3 120 x 3 140 x 3 160 x 2 180 x 2 200 x 1 217.5 x 1 225 x 1 225 x 1 SLDL 3 x 5 at 175 Push press 60 x 3 70 x 3 80 x 2 90 x 1 97.5 x 1 100 x 1 Had only planned to go to 97.5 again, but was feeling pretty good so went for the big one. First triple figures in a while plus some back and ham work No training today | |||
» Masters lifting (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 11:27 | ||
marc said:Yes tony IPF. BDFPA the day your 40....and welcome to the pensioners for january Not quite there yet marc..i'm 39 next year so another year to go. Was merely enquiring!! | |||
» Masters lifting (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 10:28 | ||
Cheers Bryn - so is that from jan 1st of the year that you are 40? | |||
» Masters lifting (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 09:48 | ||
When can you start lifting as an M1 in GBPF and BDFPA? I'm eager to get away from lifting with young whippersnappers and start lifting with the pipe and slippers brigade... | |||
» Now that's what I call mediocrity 7 (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 09:26 | ||
Cheers Neil - finally getting back into a bit of a groove. I have been guilty over the last year of being a bit of a routine whore and wanting super quick results. That ain't gonna happen after 20+ years of training so now I go slow and steady and do what I know works for me | |||
» Now that's what I call mediocrity 7 (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 09:19 | ||
Bit of the ol' DOMS in my quads this morning. Not felt that for a while Must start doing fronties on a regular basis now. I don't mind being bested by the monsters, but when Smalls's fronties are 50kg more than mine, it's time to get down to business!! | |||
» The SMALL Workout log. (Go to post) | 09-12-2010 @ 09:00 | ||
MrSmall said: Front squats 130x1 PB. f**kbags Smalls, you are out front squatting me by 50kg - I need to get my arse in gear!!! | |||
» Tried sumo dead lifts today (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 15:37 | ||
Wayne, what's happening? Cutting depth in squats, sumo deads? Are you turning into a YouTube warrior? | |||
» Now that's what I call mediocrity 7 (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 14:21 | ||
Post Edited: 09.12.2010 @ 09:26 AM by Tony_Bonner 08/12/10Squats few fronties with bar only then back squats 60 x 5 60 x 5 100 x 3 120 x 3 140 x 3 160 x 2 172.5 x 1 172.5 x 1 Fronties 3 x 3 at 80 (probably a PB) leg extensions 3 x 8 x '6' Bench 60 x 5 60 x 5 100 x 3 110 x 3 120 x 2 127.5 x 3 127.5 x 3 these last couple of triples were meant to only be singles so very pleased with this CGBP 117.5 x 5 117.5 x 4 117.5 x 3 118 kg this lunchtime...oh f**king dear . Think I will console myself with a chippy tea | |||
» GOMAD? (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 11:41 | ||
JC said:Excuse my ignorance....WTF is 'Gomad' "Gallon Of Milk A Day" mate. You probably do it with your choccy milk! | |||
» GOMAD? (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 11:26 | ||
little_a said: Not bad mate. Very busy, and not doing a lot of training at the mo. Dont get on here much apart from the odd bit of PMing. Hope all's well with you bud. Good thanks mate..became a dad 7 weeks ago and haven't trained much since. Missing the test top ups !! | |||
» GOMAD? (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 11:02 | ||
little_a said: In the link shown it's the lower end of normal. On a GB based forum such as this that figure would probably be laughed at. Globaly I wouldn't be surprised if it's accurate. That said, I wouldn't really care if it wasn't. Who knows? Hi Andy, not seen you on here for a while. Things going OK?? | |||
» GOMAD? (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 10:35 | ||
Post Edited: 08.12.2010 @ 10:38 AM by Tony_Bonner Steve said: Do you know how "normal" BMI was worked out and what is actually meant by "normal"? That is an incredibly low weight. I wouldn't be surprised if many top marathon runners were heavier than that. Not sure but I think it came from population data from the 40's and 50's. Could well be talking out of my arse though. So called normal BMI is between 20 and 25, but takes no accouunt of any training at all or indeed bodyfat levels EDIT: Wikipedia says it was developed in the mid 19th century by a Belgian fella | |||
» Plans for 2011 (Go to post) | 08-12-2010 @ 10:27 | ||
JC said:Less strongman comps....more boozing That is all solid goals Traps |