First Man Film, Did The USA Go To The Moon ?

Wayne_Cowdrey said:They appear to not be wearing a spacesuit. Maybe.

Rick said:
The Russians DIDN'T go.

little_a said:
Soviets Rick

AMH_Power said:
Anyway, I think we live in a closed system.

AMH_Power said:The biggest argument I have is no photos of the earth.
They are all composite/photoshopped 'to meet our expectations'.

Source; NASA: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html

The second biggest argument is that we destroyed the technology to go to the moon (what??).

Source; NASA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y

As for Russia crying foul if USA didn't go... they are one in the same. All space agencies are masonic entities. If there's any masons here look at the register of supported institutes next time you are at the grand lodge; all one in the same.

As for NASA, there are lots and lots of videos showing their lies. I'm not talking about ridiculous claims like 'moon flag flapping in the wind', I'm talking about greenscreen failures, CGI failures, transparent people and other undeniable f**kery.

Example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNf6VkaTtgg


If these examples don't register with you, then I don't think anything would ever have you question any lie given to you by the powers that be.

f**k me, even the videos from the ISS in 1999 vs 2019 are a joke. We now have lightning effects, vortex effects, crespuclar lighting effects, parallax mapping of the landmass... all computer fx which wasn't there in 99... Unless the world has changed that much with new neon lighting and cloud types?

Anyway, I think we live in a closed system. This is from reading accounts from both side of the coin. Those that research both open minded tend to believe we didn't go, and vice versa.

This is a decent video which is factually correct from what I can find:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR296RWS0yM&t=192s

Rick said:Hmm.

"No photos of the earth". You seem, by citing that website, to be conflating the Blue Marble project that started in the the early 2000s, which is a composite rendering of a 3D Earth, with the Blue Marble photograph from 1972, which is... A PHOTOGRAPH. Thinking about it, if this argument held water, it would be an argument that we have not launched actual satellites, which is so absurd that I can't credit it being held by anybody not mad enough to believe the earth is flat.

I watched about half of your video "exposing NASA fakery". I am unsurprised to see it was posted by a flat earther. All I can say on that is, I do not think it shows what I think you think it shows.

The Masonic argument is new to me. Insane, but new. Quite apart from anything else, it massively expands the size of the conspiracy needed, and that size would be implausible already even if purely internal to NASA. Humans in numbers can't keep cool secrets.

Rick said:Hmm.

"No photos of the earth". You seem, by citing that website, to be conflating the Blue Marble project that started in the the early 2000s, which is a composite rendering of a 3D Earth, with the Blue Marble photograph from 1972, which is... A PHOTOGRAPH. Thinking about it, if this argument held water, it would be an argument that we have not launched actual satellites, which is so absurd that I can't credit it being held by anybody not mad enough to believe the earth is flat.

I watched about half of your video "exposing NASA fakery". I am unsurprised to see it was posted by a flat earther. All I can say on that is, I do not think it shows what I think you think it shows.

The Masonic argument is new to me. Insane, but new. Quite apart from anything else, it massively expands the size of the conspiracy needed, and that size would be implausible already even if purely internal to NASA. Humans in numbers can't keep cool secrets.