REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 1 member and 208 guests

How about a job with the BBC, nice studio, comfortable chair.......

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

1234

slimsimIcon...19-07-2017 @ 23:41 
My asshole is not watertight.
Member 2926, 6050 posts
SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225
550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq
The_Lone_Wolf said:
What's been buried Rick? They increased the retirement age?

They've changed the state retirement age to 68 20-years earlier than they were going to.

Personally, I don't think that such a big issue. Needs must and all that. We are an aging population and there isn't going to be enough people working to support the retirees without making changes like these. Plus, anyone wholly reliant on the state pension for their elderly welfare is going to have major problems and working an extra 12-months is likely to be the least of them.
unit94Icon...20-07-2017 @ 01:13 
Avatar
what is everyone's fran time?
Member 3986, 10443 posts
SQ 340, BP 200, DL 400
940.0 kgs @ 129kgs Eq
Well the government has a billion pound bribe hole in their budget so they have to reclaim it somewhere to be fair
danbaseleyIcon...20-07-2017 @ 05:28 
Avatar
A member for 10 years and still no mouldy peanuts
Member 1252, 4474 posts
SQ 160, BP 110, DL 215
485.0 kgs @ 98kgs UnEq
People always bring up nurses as people who are underpaid.

Which may well be true.

But how much should nurses earn?

Let's say £50,000 - this is a nice round figure that is not "silly" money - but rewards the vital part they play in our society.

Of course if every qualified nurse was paid £50,000 that would mean an annual bill of 18.8 BILLION pounds.

Those who balk at a £145 million pay bill for the highest earners in the BBC, might find that a little hard to swallow.
slimsimIcon...20-07-2017 @ 09:06 
My asshole is not watertight.
Member 2926, 6050 posts
SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225
550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq
danbaseley said:People always bring up nurses as people who are underpaid.

Which may well be true.

But how much should nurses earn?

Let's say £50,000 - this is a nice round figure that is not "silly" money - but rewards the vital part they play in our society.

Of course if every qualified nurse was paid £50,000 that would mean an annual bill of 18.8 BILLION pounds.

Those who balk at a £145 million pay bill for the highest earners in the BBC, might find that a little hard to swallow.


Better add in all the armed forces and fire fighters to that list as well Dan!
slow_lift_joeIcon...20-07-2017 @ 09:07 
Interesting
Member 6186, 245 posts
A nurse does a more important job than a DJ or a full of themselves presenter on strictly come xxxxxxx dancing !

If a nurse gets paid £50,000 for their job then fine and the bill is billions then we are going in the right direction, providing we get the tax system right and the celebrity culture sorted out.

I am sorry these presenters are not worth the money, if you think they are then good luck to you, in my opinion you have your priorities wrong and that is why this country is so divided and broken.

I would make sure the tax loop holes are changed in this country and the BBC is made to take adverts and if then the new commercial BBC want to pay the likes of Evans and Campbell silly money for their egos and complete xxxx they talk then fine, I can read a book or watch my sport.

Or we can watch our large TV's and drive our German BWM's and party on and xxxx it and everyone else, I okay I watch love xxxxxxx island.
Lets just keep the revolving door within the elite-perpetual movement of MP's into media, celebrity, business lobbying, the City etc.Let reinforce the value of aims of the so called free markets and the establishment.

It is about balance and fairness, it is simple really.
I want a focus on industry rather than financialism and human greed.

Please do not get me started as I will jump on a train meet the lot of you at a train station and take you all on with my rolled up copy of the radio times.

Che Guevara up the revolution !
matthewvcIcon...20-07-2017 @ 10:19 
Avatar
‘downsizing’
Member 5704, 3220 posts
SQ 280, BP 210, DL 320
810.0 kgs @ 96.3kgs UnEq
i don't see why talent being rewarded is so bad.
bringing up nursing, teaching is moot as most people of a
reasonable intelligence and education level can qualify to do these jobs.

doing something like winning Wimbledon (which netted federer and garbine £2.2 million each)
takes exceptional talent, dedication and sacrifice from an early age, beating off swathes of competition
from amateur weekend warriors up to other highly gifted rivals.

outside of sport stars the majority of 6-figure incomes are pretty tough to obtain; need a lot of education, experience
and competition to get, or a lot of risk and good fortune if through your own business endeavours.
slimsimIcon...20-07-2017 @ 10:38 
My asshole is not watertight.
Member 2926, 6050 posts
SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225
550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq
matthewvc said:i don't see why talent being rewarded is so bad.
bringing up nursing, teaching is moot as most people of a
reasonable intelligence and education level can qualify to do these jobs.

doing something like winning Wimbledon (which netted federer and garbine £2.2 million each)
takes exceptional talent, dedication and sacrifice from an early age, beating off swathes of competition
from amateur weekend warriors up to other highly gifted rivals.

outside of sport stars the majority of 6-figure incomes are pretty tough to obtain; need a lot of education, experience
and competition to get, or a lot of risk and good fortune if through your own business endeavours.


Exactly!

Presenters are also like the top sports stars. Yes, some of them might get on people's tits but if they weren't good at their jobs then someone who was better would replace them. Simple!

I also think that six figure salaries aren't that uncommon. I've worked with a LOT of people earning more than £100k, and some earning vastly more, and nobody would dream of making them disclose their incomes to the nation. The BBC pay these people the salaries they pay because if they didn't they'd be working on Sky or ITV or some other channel that WOULD pay them. As has previously been said, it's all supply and demand, nothing more, nothing less.
matthewvcIcon...20-07-2017 @ 10:59 
Avatar
‘downsizing’
Member 5704, 3220 posts
SQ 280, BP 210, DL 320
810.0 kgs @ 96.3kgs UnEq
Post Edited: 20.07.2017 @ 11:02 AM by matthewvc
slimsim said:
Exactly!
Presenters are also like the top sports stars. Yes, some of them might get on people's tits but if they weren't good at their jobs then someone who was better would replace them. Simple!
I also think that six figure salaries aren't that uncommon. I've worked with a LOT of people earning more than £100k, and some earning vastly more, and nobody would dream of making them disclose their incomes to the nation. The BBC pay these people the salaries they pay because if they didn't they'd be working on Sky or ITV or some other channel that WOULD pay them. As has previously been said, it's all supply and demand, nothing more, nothing less.


I'm surprised how low they are in general. That most of Eastenders cast is on less that 150K is surprising, considering it is their best watched show. Sky certainly pay their top on screen far more.

that aside.. how chris evans still gets top billing is beyond me. his career at the BBC is like Alan Partridge's. 'you have a reputation for making mostly bad TV' as the commissioning editor Tony Hayers says to Alan (in the episode where he's suggesting stupid TV shows like 'arm wrestling with chas and dave' )
RickIcon...20-07-2017 @ 11:05 
Avatar
I am a bench-only guy
Member 3, 10034 posts
SQ 185, BP 175, DL 235
595.0 kgs @ 140kgs UnEq
Administrator
Post Edited: 20.07.2017 @ 11:07 AM by Rick
slimsim said:
I also think that six figure salaries aren't that uncommon.


About 2%.

As has previously been said, it's all supply and demand, nothing more, nothing less.


It really isn't, you know (actually, the exception probably is athletes and performers, which ironically is what were were originally discussing). Maths and physics teaching are probably the most obvious examples of jobs where there is chronic undersupply at the (not-market-set) salary. Medicine and politics are fairly obvious examples of large salaries without even a hint of undersupply (medicine courses are hugely over-subscribed by people with the requisite grades). Medics have played a superb hand over the last twenty years to drive the divergence of their incomes from other stable-work professionals (and good luck to them).

In general frictionless market theories tend not to apply that well to the actual world; this is even truer in salaries than most other areas, where things are distorted by political action, people's understandable reluctance to change to a different career where that means starting again at the bottom, and people who set wages' equally understandable tendency to pay themselves rather well. And at one time there were effective trades unions, of course, from whom we still have SOME legacies (paid holidays etc).

I'm not complaining. I do well enough for my needs, and I have enough transferable skills and low enough debts that I COULD jump ship if I really wanted to. But the idea that remuneration is set principally by merit and market doesn't, in my experience and opinion, survive much contact with the facts.

(The idea that income, and indeed promotion, are driven as much by desire for them as anything else does, but that's a whole different conversation.)
slow_lift_joeIcon...20-07-2017 @ 13:02 
Interesting
Member 6186, 245 posts
Most sports including Tennis are elite sports these days.

To join a tennis club or watch tennis live or football live is silly money.

Celebrity and the so called establishment are amassing wealth in a way that has no precedent in modern times and this due to the mainstream attitude.

"Free Markets"

"Because I'm Worth It"

Whilst our front line forces do not have vital kit.

Austerity reduce public expenditure, pay the DJ 2.2 million !

The BBC is public money.
IainKendrickIcon...20-07-2017 @ 14:38 
Avatar
some nice relaxing jazz.
Member 77, 12599 posts
SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280
710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq
Although footballers et al earning stupid money is stupid and illogical there is probably not that much that can be done to reverse this trend.
IainKendrickIcon...20-07-2017 @ 14:40 
Avatar
some nice relaxing jazz.
Member 77, 12599 posts
SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280
710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq
Rick said:
It really isn't, you know (actually, the exception probably is athletes and performers, which ironically is what were were originally discussing). Maths and physics teaching are probably the most obvious examples of jobs where there is chronic undersupply at the (not-market-set) salary. Medicine and politics are fairly obvious examples of large salaries without even a hint of undersupply (medicine courses are hugely over-subscribed by people with the requisite grades). Medics have played a superb hand over the last twenty years to drive the divergence of their incomes from other stable-work professionals (and good luck to them).
In general frictionless market theories tend not to apply that well to the actual world; this is even truer in salaries than most other areas, where things are distorted by political action, people's understandable reluctance to change to a different career where that means starting again at the bottom, and people who set wages' equally understandable tendency to pay themselves rather well. And at one time there were effective trades unions, of course, from whom we still have SOME legacies (paid holidays etc).
I'm not complaining. I do well enough for my needs, and I have enough transferable skills and low enough debts that I COULD jump ship if I really wanted to. But the idea that remuneration is set principally by merit and market doesn't, in my experience and opinion, survive much contact with the facts.
(The idea that income, and indeed promotion, are driven as much by desire for them as anything else does, but that's a whole different conversation.)


Well said.
JohnIcon...20-07-2017 @ 16:28 
#biggef
Member 5263, 3492 posts
SQ 260, BP 195, DL 260
715.0 kgs @ 130kgs UnEq
unit94 said:Well the government has a billion pound bribe hole in their budget so they have to reclaim it somewhere to be fair


Lol this x2 Happy
JohnIcon...20-07-2017 @ 16:35 
#biggef
Member 5263, 3492 posts
SQ 260, BP 195, DL 260
715.0 kgs @ 130kgs UnEq
slow_lift_joe said:call it supply and demand, or call it what you like.

Footballers and celebrity people in this country are not heroes, they are not saving lives and they are not that entertaining, if fact most are inept and just plain lucky and in the right place at the right time.

I tell what talent is a heart transplant, a great medical break through.

This is just greed and it shows our values as a society.


I agree with most of what your saying here, this I why kids will put themselves in danger for a few likes on social media, and want the latest designer gear and such ,added to which nurses are being fined for being parked at work and are struggling to pay of huge fines while they are saving lives while some people are getting paid ridiculous amounts for not doing much at all something is very wrong.
IrishMarcIcon...20-07-2017 @ 16:51 
no really Irish
Member 1196, 5908 posts
SQ 312, BP 230, DL 320
862.0 kgs @ 114kgs UnEq
People get paid what they are worth generally if the BBC wasn't paying them it then the likelihood is most of them would get the same if not more elsewhere.

I don't see how people are surprised by this in any way.

1234

© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions