Pete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:08 |
![]() has spent time in a modern educational setting Member 47, 1221 posts | Post Edited: 20.11.2013 @ 08:09 AM by Pete Fatpete said: One of my pet hates appears in that article, they state that powerlifting is a world full of acronyms and then list a string of abbreviations, none of which are acronyms. I also find it irritating when 'acronym' is used instead of 'abbreviation'. | ||
Fatpete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:15 |
![]() Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 18670 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | macroth said: You would find yourself in disagreement with the Oxford English Dictionary on the subject. But not with Chambers | ||
Pete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:16 |
![]() has spent time in a modern educational setting Member 47, 1221 posts | macroth said: You would find yourself in disagreement with the Oxford English Dictionary on the subject. Really? | ||
Fatpete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:18 |
![]() Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 18670 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | I said: But not with Chambers Nor http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym | ||
Pete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:20 |
![]() has spent time in a modern educational setting Member 47, 1221 posts | I am confident that most sources/dictionaries would support the distinction that you make between the two terms, Fatpete. | ||
macroth | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:21 |
![]() no longer the Swiss Deadlift record holder Member 3517, 3368 posts SQ 182.5, BP 122.5, DL 255560.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Pete said: I also find it irritating when 'acronym' is used instead of 'abbreviation'. It's not used instead of abbreviation. If you're being picky, it's used instead of initialism. Initialisms and acronyms are both abbreviations. | ||
macroth | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:22 |
![]() no longer the Swiss Deadlift record holder Member 3517, 3368 posts SQ 182.5, BP 122.5, DL 255560.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Pete said: macroth said: You would find yourself in disagreement with the Oxford English Dictionary on the subject. Really? http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/1844?rskey=1BN8vL&result=1#e... | ||
macroth | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:23 |
![]() no longer the Swiss Deadlift record holder Member 3517, 3368 posts SQ 182.5, BP 122.5, DL 255560.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Did you even read that? "also : an abbreviation (as FBI) formed from initial letters : initialism" | ||
Fatpete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:30 |
![]() Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 18670 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq | macroth said: Did you even read that? "also : an abbreviation (as FBI) formed from initial letters : initialism" Yes - a WORD formed from initial letters Initialism is an ABBREVIATION formed from initial letters That seems pretty clear to me. Of course once enough people get it wrong it ceases to become wrong. We must be getting close to that now. But just because the dictionaries surrender doesn't mean I have to. | ||
Pete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 08:30 |
![]() has spent time in a modern educational setting Member 47, 1221 posts | Post Edited: 20.11.2013 @ 08:35 AM by Pete macroth said: Did you even read that? "also : an abbreviation (as FBI) formed from initial letters : initialism" I, like Fatpete, became 'carried away' due to realising that the article didn't use 'acronyms'. Well, I do enjoy learning about items that allow for further pedantism. Thanks for the definitions, macroth. I think that I'll use Google before jumping in next time. ![]() Edit: I've changed the first letter of your name to a lower case 'm'. ![]() | ||
Pete | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 09:17 |
![]() has spent time in a modern educational setting Member 47, 1221 posts | Interestingly, the Oxford English Dictionary use some 'initialisms' when providing examples of the most commonly used *abbreviations* in their dictionary. http://public.oed.com/how-to-use-the-oed/abbreviations/#a | ||
macroth | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 09:17 |
![]() no longer the Swiss Deadlift record holder Member 3517, 3368 posts SQ 182.5, BP 122.5, DL 255560.0 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq | Fatpete said: Yes - a WORD formed from initial letters Initialism is an ABBREVIATION formed from initial letters That seems pretty clear to me. Of course once enough people get it wrong it ceases to become wrong. We must be getting close to that now. But just because the dictionaries surrender doesn't mean I have to. My point was that Merriam accepts both concepts as a definition of acronym ("also"), contrary to your claim. It also seems to me that the confusion between acronyms and initialisms is actually quite old, not some sort of sign of modern decadence. IOW, IMHO, not worthy of any degree of hate. After all, YOLO. | ||
polkovnikostin | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 10:07 |
Member 4803, 410 posts | Fatpete said: polkovnikostin said: And do my eyes deceive me, or is there rubber and metal on the same bar in that picture?? I wish they did, but I fear they do not. I will await the official reason before passing judgement, but I fear I will have to wait a long time for that. I would hope that the obvious and most common reason does not apply. Which is...? | ||
Tom_Martin | ![]() | ... | 20-11-2013 @ 10:26 |
![]() No one believed him anyway. Member 958, 11411 posts SQ 410, BP 215, DL 4251050.0 kgs @ 100kgs UnEq | polkovnikostin said: Which is...? Surely the obvious reason is "these are the calibrated plates we have". Why that would bother Fatpete I am not sure. From the IPF Technical Rule Book (yes I know it wasn't an IPF event) (b) Discs shall conform as follows : 1. All discs used in competition must weigh within 0.25 percent or 10 grams of their face value. Face Value in Kilos Maximum Minimum 25.0 25.0625 24.9375 20.0 20.05 19.95 15.0 15.0375 14.9625 10.0 10.025 9.975 5.0 5.0125 4.9875 2.5 2.51 2.49 1.25 1.26 1.24 .5 .51 .49 .25 .26 .24 2. The hole size in the middle of the disc must not exceed 53 mm or be less than 52 mm. 3. Discs must be within the following range: 1.25 kg, 2.5 kg, 5 kg, 10 kg, 15 kg, 20 kg, and 25 kg. 4. For record purposes, lighter discs may be used to achieve a weight of at least 0.5 kg more than the existing record. 5. Discs weighing 20 kg and over must not exceed 6 cm in thickness. Discs weighing 15 kg and under must not exceed 3 cm in thickness. Rubber discs do not have to conform to the stated thickness. 6. Discs must conform to the following colour code : 10kg and under - any colour, 15kg - yellow, 20kg - blue, 25kg – red. 7. All discs must be clearly marked with their weight and loaded in the sequence of heavier discs innermost with the smaller discs in descending weight arranged so that the referees can read the weight on each disc. 8. The first and heaviest discs loaded on the bar must be loaded face in; with the rest of the discs loaded face out. 9. The diameter of the largest discs shall not be more than 45 cm. 10. Rubber or rubber covered discs are acceptable provided there is a minimum of 10 cm from the outside of the collars to the end of the bar, for spotter grip outside of the discs. What's the problem with rubber plates, Pete? | ||