REGISTER AN ACCOUNT
Who's Online - 0 members and 162 guests
You are here: HomeForumGeneral BullshitU120kg Strongman

U120kg Strongman

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

12

force10IconU120kg Strongman25-12-2013 @ 20:25 
Avatar
Drugs cheat
Member 3860, 630 posts
SQ 335, BP 210, DL 330
875.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq
Who voted yes and why ?
JamieGIcon...25-12-2013 @ 20:32 
Avatar
Tom's CNS is better than steroids
Member 2886, 2973 posts
SQ 190, BP 122.5, DL 210
522.5 kgs @ 90kgs UnEq
I voted yes originally but now changed my mind.
unit94Icon...25-12-2013 @ 20:35 
Avatar
what is everyone's fran time?
Member 3986, 10432 posts
SQ 340, BP 200, DL 400
940.0 kgs @ 129kgs Eq
I don't think it would be a great idea but alot of peoples point was that alot of guys don't want to get up to a massive 140+ bodyweight to be competiive at opens.
Benfrancis1993Icon...25-12-2013 @ 20:46 
Avatar
Cut toe in half = bad day.
Member 4359, 3581 posts
SQ 270, BP 140, DL 310
720.0 kgs @ 137kgs UnEq
f**k 120

170+ is the dream
JamesHIcon...25-12-2013 @ 22:55 
Avatar
my buttocks hurt
Member 337, 2119 posts
SQ 300, BP 140, DL 305
745.0 kgs @ 125kgs Eq
Not the most festive thread, but to add my views, I didn't vote. As someone who would naturally fit into that class, I can see the point. I don't want to walk around at 20st plus, as it impedes your everyday life (and I look a mess). However, I'm a bit torn by the notion of so many weight classes, as one of the things that has always attracted me to strongman is the rather extreme, freakish nature of the sport. I like that it's not accessible, easy etc. It's pretty much the point of it!

So...no idea. But I can't say I'd be that interested in competitions unless they led somewhere. A one-off u120 doesn't appeal. Having a weight class structure (like in the US) would make me consider it more seriously.
JCIcon...26-12-2013 @ 10:22 
Avatar
technical retard
Member 172, 36827 posts
SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335
850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq
JamesH said:Not the most festive thread, but to add my views, I didn't vote. As someone who would naturally fit into that class, I can see the point. I don't want to walk around at 20st plus, as it impedes your everyday life (and I look a mess). However, I'm a bit torn by the notion of so many weight classes, as one of the things that has always attracted me to strongman is the rather extreme, freakish nature of the sport. I like that it's not accessible, easy etc. It's pretty much the point of it!

So...no idea. But I can't say I'd be that interested in competitions unless they led somewhere. A one-off u120 doesn't appeal. Having a weight class structure (like in the US) would make me consider it more seriously.


100% agree with James
RyanHIcon...26-12-2013 @ 22:45 
Avatar
Big fish in a small pond
Member 1150, 2101 posts
I think for it to ever work you would need a structure of competitions to lead to main events etc.
MarkIcon...27-12-2013 @ 11:38 
Member.
Member 2171, 1612 posts
I voted yes, but then realised that it would be almost as heavy as "opens" anyway, so no real point.
MotorbikerIcon...27-12-2013 @ 13:36 
Avatar
Member 4115, 1247 posts
SQ 195, BP 140, DL 220
555.0 kgs @ 82.5kgs UnEq
I think if you don't want to be a giant beast than there's already 105kg for the fairly giant people.

If there was 120 then it would only be a year or two before people ask for 135kg weight class.

But i'm tiny so don't know the personal issues of literally being that size.
samue1sonIcon...27-12-2013 @ 14:30 
Avatar
Member 4416, 1369 posts
SQ 210, BP 175, DL 240
625.0 kgs @ 122kgs UnEq
I think that there should be a weight class for every 2kg differential per person.
Then you can be a multi weight champion much easier.
PeteHodgsonIcon...27-12-2013 @ 14:36 
Avatar
Has little understanding of the sugden
Member 677, 11338 posts
SQ 165, BP 125, DL 220
510.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq
I don't think there should be a120kg class. Its too Late now, but I think 105 is the wrong weight for a class. Should be something like 90 or 95 then 115 or 120,then opens.
JCIcon...27-12-2013 @ 14:48 
Avatar
technical retard
Member 172, 36827 posts
SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335
850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq
PeteHodgson said:I don't think there should be a120kg class. Its too Late now, but I think 105 is the wrong weight for a class. Should be something like 90 or 95 then 115 or 120,then opens.


You're forgetting that when the 105s was formed, most opens were 120-140, so a 115-120 class would have been nonsical
martinbIcon...27-12-2013 @ 14:59 
Avatar
Grass fed
Member 1147, 7710 posts
SQ 220, BP 185, DL 272.5
677.5 kgs @ 113kgs UnEq
JC said:
You're forgetting that when the 105s was formed, most opens were 120-140, so a 115-120 class would have been nonsical


How times have changed.
PaulSavageIcon...27-12-2013 @ 15:00 
Member 2775, 6927 posts
I don't think there's anything wrong with 120k weight class, I just don't think it would interest too many people. The top level guys at any weight class other than open are going to be depleting and cutting water so your looking at guys who are pretty much opens and opens is a much more prestigious devision than a newly started one.
PeteHodgsonIcon...27-12-2013 @ 15:35 
Avatar
Has little understanding of the sugden
Member 677, 11338 posts
SQ 165, BP 125, DL 220
510.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq
JC said:
You're forgetting that when the 105s was formed, most opens were 120-140, so a 115-120 class would have been nonsical


really? what wimpy scrawny opens! lol
nonsical is a great word btw. Wink

12

You are here: HomeForumGeneral BullshitU120kg Strongman
© Sugden Barbell 2024 - Mobile Version - Privacy - Terms & Conditions