Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest
JC | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 11:16 |
![]() technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Dave284 said: I'm sure he has, but Mendes lifted at nationals a month or so ago to qualify for pan-ams, then at pan-ams, and then at worlds. Presumably he had to be prepared to be tested at all three so has been off for some time. I doubt Iran takes WADA as seriously as the US do in terms of internal testing, so they mainly have to worry about international comps - ie World's, Asian games and Olympics - so 1-3 times a year at most? Its a huge assumption, to assume the guy takes gear! Either way, the amont of comps he's done is that relevant to his time off, as (if, he indeed takes PEDS) he could take a drug that would be at of his system in a matter of days For some designer steriods, I'm sure that time period is even shorter | ||
Dave284 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 11:21 |
Member 832, 522 posts SQ 50, BP 0, DL 050.0 kgs @ 74kgs UnEq | JC said: Its a huge assumption, to assume the guy takes gear! Either way, the amont of comps he's done is that relevant to his time off, as (if, he indeed takes PEDS) he could take a drug that would be at of his system in a matter of days For some designer steriods, I'm sure that time period is even shorter True, but he won't just be tested at comps, once he competed for the first time and did well he'll be on the WADA radar and subject to random testing. Even more so when he won their nationals and got selected for the Pan-Am and World teams. I don't see the assumption really...if you want to win at WL you have to be on at some stage, simple as that. | ||
JC | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 11:37 |
![]() technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Dave284 said: True, but he won't just be tested at comps, once he competed for the first time and did well he'll be on the WADA radar and subject to random testing. By that reasoning, all the top guys would never be on then, as they are always the subject of random testing!? I think if they are "on", they are "on" till very close to the comp (as unless you get early notification (?) of random tests, there is no guaranteed way to be clean for them, other than being clean!) | ||
MrSmall | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 11:40 |
Gone and easily forgotten....... Member 331, 22298 posts SQ 185, BP 100, DL 230515.0 kgs @ 85kgs UnEq | JC said: there is no guaranteed way to be clean for them, other than being clean! I LOLed at this, you drug fuelled beast you. OSG on Sat? | ||
JC | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 11:49 |
![]() technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | MrSmall said: I LOLed at this, you drug fuelled beast you. OSG on Sat? Smalls, Dave's insistence was that all the top guys were using If tests are actually completely random, with no prior notification, the only way I can forsee that tests are passed, is if the athlete is clean! Undecided about weekend training yet mate...potential childcare issues | ||
Dave284 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 13:40 |
Member 832, 522 posts SQ 50, BP 0, DL 050.0 kgs @ 74kgs UnEq | There are virtually no top guys from countries that test a lot - USA, UK, etc. I'm obviously not trying to argue that drugs are the only factor, that is ridiculous, there is no money in WL in these countries, little support, small participation rates, less coaches, no exposure etc and those factors could all arguably play a role. However when you have a guy already doing 207/240+, those concerns are irrelevant for him. It seems, from admittedly anecdotal sources, that the RUS, CHIN, IRAN etc lifters (ie the top lifters) do not get tested internally so they can be 'on' all year round, apart from at international comps or the occasional IWF out of comp testing. The UK and USA make a point of internally testing the s**t of out lifters year round, having to report a location once every few weeks that they'll be etc. What I am saying is that Mendes, by not having done a comp, missed out on all that potential testing when he was doing 207/240+. He then came off and qualified for nationals doing 175/210 (ish). This alerted him to WADA. He then did 175/210 (ish) at nationals, 175/210(ish) at Pan-Am's and then 172/*** at World's over the course of the next three months when he was open to being tested. By contrast Salimi did 217 at the Iranian nationals (no WR as not drug tested or international comp) and then 214 in Paris - presumably after being off for much less time than Mendes. Case in point the young Iranian superheavy from a few years ago who did a s**tload in winning junior worlds, 200+ snatch etc, then failed two drugs tests (at comps) and got a life ban. | ||
Steve | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:16 |
nothing to hide, please follow my life on webcam Member 255, 3732 posts | Dave284 said:There are virtually no top guys from countries that test a lot - USA, UK, etc. I'm obviously not trying to argue that drugs are the only factor, that is ridiculous, there is no money in WL in these countries, little support, small participation rates, less coaches, no exposure etc and those factors could all arguably play a role. However when you have a guy already doing 207/240+, those concerns are irrelevant for him. It seems, from admittedly anecdotal sources, that the RUS, CHIN, IRAN etc lifters (ie the top lifters) do not get tested internally so they can be 'on' all year round, apart from at international comps or the occasional IWF out of comp testing. The UK and USA make a point of internally testing the s**t of out lifters year round, having to report a location once every few weeks that they'll be etc. What I am saying is that Mendes, by not having done a comp, missed out on all that potential testing when he was doing 207/240+. He then came off and qualified for nationals doing 175/210 (ish). This alerted him to WADA. He then did 175/210 (ish) at nationals, 175/210(ish) at Pan-Am's and then 172/*** at World's over the course of the next three months when he was open to being tested. By contrast Salimi did 217 at the Iranian nationals (no WR as not drug tested or international comp) and then 214 in Paris - presumably after being off for much less time than Mendes. Case in point the young Iranian superheavy from a few years ago who did a s**tload in winning junior worlds, 200+ snatch etc, then failed two drugs tests (at comps) and got a life ban. Top weightlifters from all Countries are required to comply with the ADAMS wherabouts system giving the IWF details of their wherabouts on a daily basis and a number of Countries, including Bulgaria were suspended before for the Worlds for failing to do so ruling them out of the Worlds and next years Olympics. | ||
Luke27 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:33 |
![]() lets get learning !!! Member 1598, 723 posts SQ 210, BP 130, DL 200540.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq | JC said: Its a huge assumption, to assume the guy takes gear! Either way, the amont of comps he's done is that relevant to his time off, as (if, he indeed takes PEDS) he could take a drug that would be at of his system in a matter of days For some designer steriods, I'm sure that time period is even shorter Agree'd. Some have half lives of 3 hours and cost a bomb. Made for athletes only would seem. The drugs are well infront of the testers. The test are always playing catch up. | ||
Dave284 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:42 |
Member 832, 522 posts SQ 50, BP 0, DL 050.0 kgs @ 74kgs UnEq | Steve said: Top weightlifters from all Countries are required to comply with the ADAMS wherabouts system giving the IWF details of their wherabouts on a daily basis and a number of Countries, including Bulgaria were suspended before for the Worlds for failing to do so ruling them out of the Worlds and next years Olympics. Clearly some people get around it better than others. Countries with more support for WL most likely have a better chance of doing so than a US based lifter who has to support himself. You can't honestly be trying to say that you think anybody lifetime drug free won a medal last week? | ||
JC | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:45 |
![]() technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Dave284 said: You can't honestly be trying to say that you think anybody lifetime drug free won a medal last week? Steve, doesnt know....and you don't know. The only people who know for sure, are the athlete and his coach. Everything else is just assumptions Phil Pfister insists he's lifetime drug free, and he won WSM in mid 2000s. Do I believe him? I don't know really, but i certainly don't protest to know one way or another | ||
Dave284 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:50 |
Member 832, 522 posts SQ 50, BP 0, DL 050.0 kgs @ 74kgs UnEq | You are, of course, right, we'll never know. Nor should anybody see it as a negative things if people decide to use, its their choice and people should respect that. All I'm saying is, that my theory explains the Mendes situation. I'd love for him to put it together and get somewhere with it and I shall be interested to see where he goes from here. | ||
Wigan | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:51 |
![]() a cynical old scrote Member 68, 6911 posts SQ 255, BP 132.5, DL 250637.5 kgs @ 110kgs UnEq | Dave284 said: You can't honestly be trying to say that you think anybody lifetime drug free won a medal last week? I for one dont think this to be the case, there I said it. I think there is drug use in weightlifting, oh dear!!! ![]() | ||
Wigan | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:52 |
![]() a cynical old scrote Member 68, 6911 posts SQ 255, BP 132.5, DL 250637.5 kgs @ 110kgs UnEq | Dave284 said:All I'm saying is, that my theory explains the Mendes situation. I'd love for him to put it together and get somewhere with it and I shall be interested to see where he goes from here. Sadly, i dont think the lad is going to go anywhere significant from here, but i hope he continues to lift and continues to enjoy it. Good luck to him. | ||
Dave284 | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:58 |
Member 832, 522 posts SQ 50, BP 0, DL 050.0 kgs @ 74kgs UnEq | Wigan said: Sadly, i dont think the lad is going to go anywhere significant from here, but i hope he continues to lift and continues to enjoy it. Good luck to him. Think he's peaked? | ||
JC | ![]() | ... | 15-11-2011 @ 14:59 |
![]() technical retard Member 172, 36827 posts SQ 310, BP 205, DL 335850.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq | Wigan said: I for one dont think this to be the case, there I said it. I think there is drug use in weightlifting, oh dear!!! ![]() I also think there is drug use in WL. But, my own experiences over the last year, have made me realise that maybe drug use does not have as huge an effect on strength as some feel it does (or, at least it doesn't for some, maybe due to steroid sensitivities etc.), and so conversley, some genetic freaks could be as strong naturally, as some of the top guys unnaturally | ||