First Man Film, Did The USA Go To The Moon ?

Users viewing topic: & 1 Guest

slow_lift_joe		First Man Film, Did The USA Go To The Moon ?	22-10-2018 @ 23:44
Interesting Member 6186, 245 posts	The new film First Man out in the cinemas across the UK. I know you like the Big Foot conspiracy (the man in the ape suit, or a real big foot roams the USA/Canadian wilderness.) The biggest conspiracy out there is the "Apollo Missions and Moon Landings of 1969". I am unsure 50/50. Miles to national space centre 220 miles approx from earth, miles to the moon 238,000 approx. Man has travelled to the moon once with 1969 technology. Van Allen Radiation Belts ? Film and photos made for effect ? Some of the behaviours are strange from that time. I know most theories have been debunked but I do not know what to think, some of the information and study of the time is odd and strange, I am just unsure but would like to think man did go to the moon.

Fakeinjury17		...	22-10-2018 @ 23:52
Member 6229, 67 posts SQ 140, BP 150, DL 260 550.0 kgs @ 108kgs UnEq	I am admittedly a cynical soul but do not think there is any chance that the moon landing actually happened. To me it was merely a Cold War visual oneupmanship. Although this view is born of me watching 5 minutes of a documentary once...

Fatpete		...	23-10-2018 @ 06:48
Hyper obese Pete Member 70, 17870 posts SQ 322.5, BP 205, DL 300 827.5 kgs @ 133kgs Eq	They went. Sir Patrick Moore assured me (and the rest of the country) he was an English gentleman and would never lie about something like that. Didn't they put mirrors up there so we could fire lasers at them and time how long the light took so we could calculate exact distances. That would take some explaining if we didn't do it. Plus is was a race between the USA and the USSR and the Russians never once cried foul. They went.

Rick		...	23-10-2018 @ 10:15
I am a bench-only guy Member 3, 10034 posts SQ 185, BP 175, DL 235 595.0 kgs @ 140kgs UnEq Administrator	Once? Six times, in fact. Quite apart from the mountain of scientific evidence, there are two compelling human proofs. One, as Peter mentions, is that the Russians would never have accepted a faked defeat. The second is simple human nature, and is the problem with essentially all conspiracy theories. We see every day in the news compelling evidence that large groups of people can't keep secrets. For thousands to have kept one of this scale for over fifty years is simply a ridiculous proposition.

slimsim		...	23-10-2018 @ 11:55
My asshole is not watertight. Member 2926, 6050 posts SQ 217.5, BP 107.5, DL 225 550.0 kgs @ 86kgs UnEq	Rick said:Once? Six times, in fact. Quite apart from the mountain of scientific evidence, there are two compelling human proofs. One, as Peter mentions, is that the Russians would never have accepted a faked defeat. The second is simple human nature, and is the problem with essentially all conspiracy theories. We see every day in the news compelling evidence that large groups of people can't keep secrets. For thousands to have kept one of this scale for over fifty years is simply a ridiculous proposition. ^This! If they didn't go then why would they fake going several times, that seems totally counter-intuitive. The Ruskies not crying foul is another biggie. And the nail in the coffin is the fact that hundreds haven't come forward claiming it hoax. People would literally have burst keeping that to themselves over the years. That said, there are certain elements to the story which allow this disbelief to manifest. AMH_Power is a big non-believer and was able to put together a strong argument on FB recently about this exact topic.

IainKendrick		...	23-10-2018 @ 13:11
some nice relaxing jazz. Member 77, 12599 posts SQ 265, BP 165, DL 280 710.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq	Rick said:Once? Six times, in fact. Quite apart from the mountain of scientific evidence, there are two compelling human proofs. One, as Peter mentions, is that the Russians would never have accepted a faked defeat. The second is simple human nature, and is the problem with essentially all conspiracy theories. We see every day in the news compelling evidence that large groups of people can't keep secrets. For thousands to have kept one of this scale for over fifty years is simply a ridiculous proposition. This... Fecking this... There is no doubt only the howls of the delusional

unit94		...	23-10-2018 @ 13:13
what is everyone's fran time? Member 3986, 10443 posts SQ 340, BP 200, DL 400 940.0 kgs @ 129kgs Eq	Of course they f**king did. With enough big words and long reaches you can make nearly anything sound compelling to people who already want to believe you


WILLSAN		...	23-10-2018 @ 13:57
Trump will get another four years Member 126, 16707 posts SQ 160, BP 110, DL 225 495.0 kgs @ 75kgs UnEq	unit94 said:With enough big words and long reaches you can make nearly anything sound compelling to people who already want to believe you isnt this is the exact logic that theorists use to argue that it is fake?

JackRevans		...	23-10-2018 @ 14:35
'There was also a sausage in my mouth.' Member 2477, 16481 posts SQ 190, BP 130, DL 235 555.0 kgs @ 83kgs UnEq	is the moon also flat?

Wayne_Cowdrey		...	23-10-2018 @ 14:39
Still got a little bit of strength Member 400, 22044 posts	An explanation for the reflectors is that they were put there by an unmanned mission. I've debated this to death more than once, and will limit my contribution this time around. They may well have gone, but I don't think the "official" record of it is true. I'm 100% sure that, for whatever reason, there was fakery involved. When I looked into it before I found 2 examples of footage in which an astronaut is bouncing around in reduced gravity (on a wire??) and within the same footage something else drops to the ground like it would on Earth! I even did a calculation with one of them, using the astronaut's height to get a good estimate of the distance the object fell, and the length of time it took to reach the ground was consistent with Earth's gravity - definitely not one sixth of Earth's gravity! There is other stuff like photos that nobody could have possibly taken, e.g. an aerial view of a lunar module. I'd love to know the truth.

unit94		...	23-10-2018 @ 16:06
what is everyone's fran time? Member 3986, 10443 posts SQ 340, BP 200, DL 400 940.0 kgs @ 129kgs Eq	WILLSAN said: isnt this is the exact logic that theorists use to argue that it is fake? It is however the actual evidence count is in favour of people actually being on the moon. Q

WILLSAN		...	23-10-2018 @ 17:04
Trump will get another four years Member 126, 16707 posts SQ 160, BP 110, DL 225 495.0 kgs @ 75kgs UnEq	unit94 said: It is however the actual evidence count is in favour of people actually being on the moon. Q thats exactly what someone who had been convinced that the evidence is compelling with big words and long reaches because they wanted to believe would say!

dannyboy73		...	23-10-2018 @ 19:19
Mask it or Casket !! Member 4600, 8166 posts SQ 240, BP 162.5, DL 255 657.5 kgs @ 90.5kgs UnEq	Post Edited: 23.10.2018 @ 19:23 PM by dannyboy73 you only ever see one side of the moon. That's because it is supposed to rotate at exactly the same rate as earth. Not blinkey likely... NO moon landings because there is no moon to land on!....FAKE. The moon is a convincing hologram.

PeteHodgson		...	23-10-2018 @ 19:38
Has little understanding of the sugden Member 677, 11338 posts SQ 165, BP 125, DL 220 510.0 kgs @ 80kgs UnEq	How the f**k did they make 'Button Moon' if there's no moon!! I rest my case. Mic drop.

JohnGym		...	23-10-2018 @ 19:42
Hamstrings feel activated. Member 1107, 6964 posts SQ 220, BP 152.5, DL 252.5 625.0 kgs @ 93kgs UnEq	Flat Earthers and Moon Conspiracy Theorists...Two cheeks of the same arse. They probably believe in God, too.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

You are here: Home → Forum → General Bullshit → First Man Film, Did The USA Go To The Moon ?

RETURN TO TOP